Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 06/08/20, 20:54

Exnihiloest wrote:
Obamot wrote:...

Do you know what we think of self-proclaimed econology experts like you?
... in fact monomaniacs sophists [according to moderation] : Cheesy:

We don't think so ... we don't give a damn

It is everyone's right to live with their blinders on. From there to claiming them, it was necessary to dare.


Meuuuuuuuuh nooo ...!
Those “who dare everything” are the idiots, I didn't dare anything at all, I was content to zoom in on their little turds.

I shouldn't have postponed the WHO report which points out that Glyphosate is on a list of carcinogens? Yes ? : Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 06/08/20, 21:09

Exnihiloest wrote:
Obamot wrote:...
There's no need to look for anything anymore, the WHO having classified glyphosate at the same rank as other carcinogens (among the 40 chemicals that man has produced ... it gives you a scale ...)

Among them, we have these, which should therefore also be prohibited: hot drinks, fries, crisps, grilled meat, red meat, white bread, white pasta, milk, cold meats, peanuts. , canned tomatoes, soft drinks, white flour, salted fish, alcohol, refined sugar ...

And you know what ... Downright ABOUT consuming the (almost all) industrial foods on your list, it wouldn't be stupid to stay healthy, no, not stupid at all - because foods that are NOT AT ALL required for a balanced nutritional bowl of human beings - (with one exception ... I'm a flexitarian, so I eat some meat, but everyone has their own choice!)

We must not ban anything, of course (that's yet another question, which sounds like a silly approach) ... As for wanting to put it on for your Glyphosate promo by suggesting by the band of alleged “confounding factors... It still does not take and it's doubly silly ... : Cheesy: Try again...
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9805
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2658

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by sicetaitsimple » 06/08/20, 21:52

Obamot wrote:..... required for a balanced food bolus of human beings - ..


Ah, the famous Obamot "food bowl" which comes back periodically but which remains a mystery ....

The best would be that you create a dedicated thread, which would interest or not, to describe it to us, right?
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 07/08/20, 00:34

It depends my little plug ... You are the great specialist ... (and I did not create anything, nor anything fell from the sky, believe me ...) :)

Do you want it in recovery from deficits after a bio-check or in UI? Image
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79327
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11046

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Christophe » 15/08/20, 13:17

Now pro glyphosates lobbyists become terrorists !! : Evil: : Evil: : Evil:




An intoxicated farmer, destroyed crops: an organic farm destroyed with glyphosate in the Bouches-du-Rhône

Intoxicated, the operator, who had consumed his production, had to be hospitalized. He and his wife filed a complaint. Neighboring farmers are singled out.


(...)

But a few days later, the farmer must be hospitalized urgently. Feverish, he also vomited and suffered from diarrhea. He loses seven kilos in four days. His condition compelled him to take tests: he was the victim of glyphosate poisoning. The herbicide was sprayed on his organic crops. Here they are unusable, and especially toxic, unfit for consumption in organic label. Six greenhouses out of nine were sprayed, the shortfall amounted to 35 euros. "These greenhouses, I can no longer cultivate them for two years," laments Oriane Arlaud, Tristan's wife.

(...)
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13701
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1517
Contact :

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by izentrop » 15/08/20, 15:21

Christophe wrote: pro glyphosates lobbyists become terrorists !!
What do you know as guy said;)
I think we have to wait until the end of the story before naming the culprits.

I don't think glyphosate, even at 15 times the dose, can cause symptoms like this. It has a toxic action only for plants, except the wetting adjuvant which for the most suspicious have been withdrawn from the market.

It's a tough job, even more so with the pandemic ...
1 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9805
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2658

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by sicetaitsimple » 15/08/20, 17:56

izentrop wrote:
Christophe wrote: pro glyphosates lobbyists become terrorists !!
What do you know as guy said;)
I think we have to wait until the end of the story before naming the culprits.


Indeed it seems a little quick to me to designate "pro glyphosate lobbyists" ???? A "pro glyphosate lobbyist" would destroy his neighbor's production with glyphosate? He should take some lobbying lessons .....
All is not rosy (or "green") in our countryside ....
1 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 16/08/20, 02:14

denial Image Image Image
0 x
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Moindreffor » 17/08/20, 21:03

Obamot wrote:It depends my little plug ... You are the great specialist ... (and I did not create anything, nor anything fell from the sky, believe me ...) :)

Do you want it in recovery from deficits after a bio-check or in UI? Image

well we would just like to see one that you call balanced, we let you choose the units ...
because he is like Arlésienne, you talk about it a lot, but we never see him ...
0 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 18/08/20, 12:53

Moindreffor wrote:
Obamot wrote:It depends my little plug ... You are the great specialist ... (and I did not create anything, nor anything fell from the sky, believe me ...) :)

Do you want it in recovery from deficits after a bio-check or in UI? Image

well we would just like to see one that you call balanced, we let you choose the units ...

In WHO IU then (Môssieur the chemist who does not even know the basics, or has too short a memory).
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit%C3%A9_internationale

So it is not from me!
In UI = International Units, because I believe that for a “biocheck” you are definitely lost for science.

Moindreffor wrote: because he is like Arlésienne, you talk about it a lot, but we never see him ...


In fact "from Arlésienne are you still unaware that the WHO has long defined our vitamin and nutrient requirements : Shock:
https://www.burgerstein.ch/fr/quelle-es ... t-ui-ie-iu

and to see them, (if you understood something) you would have to go back to a time when you had not even started your studies, it is to say how much you walk us with your pseudo formation of chemist , who has by far never reached the most elementary threshold of knowledge to judge ... to the point of considering “non-dangerous” the fact of seasoning his salads with mineral oil (which we use by elsewhere to lubricate internal combustion engines)! : roll: : Shock:

And the funniest part of all this (not to say hilarious) is that you are going to praise the merits of the lazy man's vegetable garden ... : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy: you wonder how you can be sick like a dog !? You're making savings? You eat industrial croquettes, instead of your vegetable production, right? : Shock: : roll: Since you are so diligent in permaculture, you would have to obtain without delay the table of all the International Unit values ​​of the foods you eat, but I fear that at this stage you will treat the WHO of “ guru ”, and the values ​​for the croquettes are missing. : Mrgreen:

(still watch out for the perchlorethylene in the salad) post405410.html # p405410
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Robob and 366 guests