bolton069 wrote: Thank you for these details, if you have photos it interests me too ..
Same answer as in Antoinet111, give me your e-mail address by mp, if you want, I don't know how to send photos by mp.
bolton069 wrote:I heard that the chestnut was also rot-proof, it must be I suppose a more common essence in our regions than "Douglas fir, Scots pine, red cedar" can someone confirm? Bham? ..
I confirm for the chestnut, it is also rot-proof, like the acacia, among others, a house was also built near my house in corded wood with chestnut logs. The problem is that we do not find this wood in the east but rather in the center / south of France, unlike the Douglas fir and Scots pine which we find quite easily in the east and especially in the mountainous areas. So it's more related to a regional distribution. And you will not do with a softwood what you will do with a hardwood, I would say that the softwood is more versatile since you can use it as it is, raw, in logs (unlike chestnut), or in sawn wood, even quartered to make corded wood. And the softwood must also be cheaper.
It is true I searched quickly for the RT2005 without finding anything of interest, I wonder if the thermal resistance required on the wall has changed. But perhaps the best is to see what is done in terms of Minergie habitat. I simply note that 30 cm of wood (perpendicular fibers) equivalent to 10 cm of stuff wool ...bolton069 wrote: In addition you are referring to the RT2000, but it seems to me that now it is the more restrictive RT2005 which is in use in France. Who can help us on this point? .
bolton069 wrote: The proposed wall: 40mm wood - 80mm expanded PS - 40mm wood
......... one can hope at worst an R of 2.72 for your wall in planks, which corresponds well to the wall R> 2.4 quoted by bham above for the RT2000.
What is terrible is to build with a "breathable" material and insert a non-breathable insulation therein which will require the installation of a CMV. When we are interested in issues of insulation, dew point, condensation therefore and we want to build healthy, then we must ban this type of insulation. Thin insulators are sidelined for that, among other things, while they are no worse in this area than polystyrenes and polyurethanes.