Weightlessness kills cancer cells?

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Weightlessness kills cancer cells?




by GuyGadebois » 14/12/19, 10:37

Pretentious!
Gift, 5.30 mins:
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Weightlessness kills cancer cells?




by Exnihiloest » 19/12/19, 22:01

GuyGadebois wrote:Pretentious!

For quoting Jules Romains ?!
My poor friend ! : roll:
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Weightlessness kills cancer cells?




by GuyGadebois » 20/12/19, 00:08

Exnihiloest wrote:
GuyGadebois wrote:Pretentious!

For quoting Jules Romains ?!
My poor friend ! : roll:

Another mistake. This is the sentence, not its author, my good friend.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Weightlessness kills cancer cells?




by Janic » 20/12/19, 08:03

rather than philosophizing about weightlessness: who can really believe that the more than 300.000 cancer patients each year could be weightless and at what stage?
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Weightlessness kills cancer cells?




by GuyGadebois » 20/12/19, 11:50

Janic wrote:rather than philosophizing about weightlessness: who can really believe that the more than 300.000 cancer patients each year could be weightless and at what stage?

At the Parc des Princes. : Mrgreen:
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Weightlessness kills cancer cells?




by Exnihiloest » 20/12/19, 20:28

Janic wrote:rather than philosophizing about weightlessness: who can really believe that the more than 300.000 cancer patients each year could be weightless and at what stage?

Who could believe in Pasteur's time that we were going to be able to vaccinate millions of people?

Regarding weightlessness, there is no solution on earth, except perhaps that which I suggested of the compensation of gravity by a magnetic field. But on the one hand it would remain to verify that the effect on cancer cells would be the same as weightlessness, and on the other hand even if it was proven, this requires enormous resources because a field of 15T on all a cancerous area would require superconducting electromagnets. So it is not tomorrow the day before that we will cure cancers like that, but any track is good to check.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Weightlessness kills cancer cells?




by Janic » 21/12/19, 10:34

Who could believe in Pasteur's time that we were going to be able to vaccinate millions of people?
who could believe it was a real future scam? Pasteur had, at least, the excuse of the lack of historical and human perspective, despite the fact that his experience had messed up statistically.
By cons it was a real economic success for the labs and it continues dare dare!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 439 guests