Ahmed wrote:This is a point that I emphasized at the beginning of this thread.
The treatment of this waste is not, fundamentally a technical problem (for a good part), but economic: do you think it is possible to succeed where the Chinese give up?
if the materials of recovery had a value, well salable for everyone, we would not mix everything and there would be no work to sort out what we mixed ... the mixtures make the work unnecessarily dirty and dangerous
alas the way of recycling worthless kills recovery activities ... those who have used equipment take no precaution to facilitate its recovery since it has no value
it's money that commands! in order to organize the recovery, we must give a positive value to all the recoverable matter ... when the materials have a value that is even low, those who are too rich to tire themselves to recuperate themselves can benefit those who have more time and less money
alas currently is the world upside down! Well-meaning people believe they are doing a good deed by putting their used thing in a garbage disposal that consumes public money to mix everything and forbid the recovery by those who have time to do so.
other bug of the current regulation: all the recycling activity is considered as dirty, classified establishment with obligations of measurer ... thus one recovers not one mixes all to get rid