I open this new subject which could follow one of the many subjects already opened on econology on the theme of stars, cosmic anti-matter and other celestial objects and phenomena.
Lately astrophysicists have proudly revealed to us the result of a collaborative technical feat that we thought was impossible, namely the first photograph of a Black hole !
Indeed...
Wednesday 10 April 2019
The first "photo" of a black hole was revealed on Wednesday by a team of astronomers and scientists. The image was developed thanks to an international collaboration called Event Horizon Telescope (EHT).
So that's what this looks like Black hole :
- Very-first-official-image-of-a-black-hole.jpg (36.54 KB) Viewed 2502 times
In reality this photo does not represent a black hole because by definition a black hole is not visible because it "sucks" everything, including light! ...
According to Wikipedia :
In astrophysics, a black hole is a celestial object so compact that the intensity of its gravitational field prevents any form of matter or radiation from escaping from it. Such objects can neither emit nor diffuse light and are therefore black, which in astronomy means that they are optically invisible.
In reality this photo shows the material sucked in by the black hole, a little as if we had photographed the water swirling at the bottom of a sink and which disappears in the siphon.
Thinking about it, several basic questions arise after the explanations given by all the astro-physicists who follow one another in the media to underline the importance of this photo, and on this phenomenon of vacuum cleaner of the gravitational field so intense that no matter no radiation can escape it ...
If the aspiration of a black hole is so important that even the light is sucked, it is because this aspiration at a speed higher than that of the light which escapes from it.
The maximum speed established by Albert Einstein, which he named C, and demonstrated by calculation is 300 ms-000. (000 km in 1 second). Taking the metaphor of water again, we can compare a light beam coming from a light source, a lamp for example, with a water jet coming out of a pipe. In the same way as if I advance the end of the pipe in the direction of the jet, I increase the (relative) speed of the water of the jet. Ditto for a lamp: if I advance in the direction of the light beam, necessarily the light beam which leaves it exceeds the speed of light (speed of light + speed of movement) ...
Finally, here are some phenomena that go in the direction of this "false" theory of Eisntein according to which the speed of light is an impassable constant: https://trustmyscience.com/4-phenomenes ... e-lumiere/
What do you think of all this? ...
