Supernumerary engine

[Bardal]

Maybe by adding a little liquid nitrogen it would work better ... It seems that it is effective ...

[alex702]

Hello sir
I would like information on these 4 attached pages
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RYGZ8 ... KD9EGEAxOQ
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yFwXc ... IUJ-8ZANaq
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1D-V00 ... mHCOVcLQKV
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-NGmU ... 8S7yw7gE9D
I saved these pages from Mr. Alfred Evert's site. Systems were
Very interesting on this site currently deleted it is a shame.
On page 4 Mr. Evert gives calculations with different fluid velocities
In this system everything turns, there is no fixed part which could brake the water it does
than go through the turbine.
Example the pump to put 20 per second, turbine to put 10 per second.
The water passes through the turbine, it only passes through the 4 blades and then finds
Water at 20 put per second a power is necessary to maintain it at 20 put per second
-Is Mr. Evert mistaken in the calculations on pages 4
Please repeat the calculations
Thank you
cordially
Alex

[Opale2sang]

Bonjour.

It looks like a torque converter, nothing "sure-unit" therein, in my opinion the calculations are theoretical and do not take into account the friction of the fluid, in any case, if I understand correctly it is just a shape of "rotary hydraulic lever", the number of rpm at the input is not the same as that at the output, but with a lower driving force, a bit like a mechanical reducer ...

Kind regards.

[alex702]

Hello everyone
the system that mister Evert explains, is not made in the same way as the video which you show.
the fluid moves on the same diameter of the turbine and pump. I just made an example of a turbine
so that the water moves once from left to right then from right to left.
shows the 4 red and blue blades. if it passes 5 liters of water per second in these blades at 20 meters per second
I think the couple will be important .......
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1v72VV ... gm289MmWVq
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MdjEj ... u72w3o0eXF
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NQ4S3 ... z2IlLCaSQ3
something else:
to see on the site
http://magpowersystem.free.fr/0-reverse ... rgerl.html
the link on the left of the page on.
Richard Clem Turbine
Richard CLEM, an American citizen, was born in 1928 and died in 1978 in the state of Texas. He is the inventor, a little by chance, of a frustoconical turbine engine with friction effect, operating by means of vegetable oil. His death in 1978 prematurely interrupted his plans to develop this exceptional machine.
it would seem that this turbine worked it was however much more complicated than the turbine of Mr. Evert
with certainly more friction therefore loss.
good reading
see you soon
amicalement
Alex

[Bardal]

It is very unfortunate that Richard Clem broke his pipe at the wrong time, just before saving humanity ... This is really no pot for us ...

I invite you to continue its work with diligence and consistency; I will be personally very attentive to the results of this research, and I am sure that I will not be the only one…


Good luck.

[alex702]

bonsoir a tous
I would like to know what you think of my explanations and my principle
turbine from my previous post.
Maybe make different blades
I will take your ideas for my future achievements.
Thank you
see you soon
Alex

[alex702]

bonsoir a tous
I come by this message to ask you
if i made a huge mistake thinking that
Mr Evert's system can work
as he says in these calculations.
my calculation requests on pages 6 of
forum self-maintained turbine remained unanswered (on the forum magnetosynergie) + machine efficiency + with moving water
in pages introduce yourself. (in the forum)
I find it astonishing that nobody does the calculation in kilograms force
to explain that the power required by the pump and higher. and
therefore give a much lower power to the turbine ??????
Thank you
see you soon
Alex

[moinsdewatt]

Thank you for not raising these nonsense.