The homeopathy explained metaphorically for Dummies

[Janic]

video of which here is an important passage:
(30 '40' ') this service is the only one that allows a child to escape from therapeutic trials (…) this allowed families being in a cancer center where we wanted to subject them to therapeutic trials, to come here and find an old-style medicine, a human medicine according to the data acquired from science. It should not be forgotten that therapeutic trials, by definition, are not data acquired from science, since the purpose of trials is to see, to create certainty in medicine. Trials are not care! When we hear that therapeutic progress is linked to trials, IT IS A PURE AND SIMPLE LIE.
What interests patients is the survival rate linked to engineers who invent a prosthesis or a device (…) are linked to techniques, chemists, biologists, it is never linked to tests, except tests phase I and phase II, which are toxicity tests [*] which are tests which are ethically difficult to bear, but which are necessary and essential, we do not criticize them, what we criticize are tests on diseases which we know and treat very well, but which are treated very badly to test, and I mean to test, it's a very profitable business (…)


(33 '24' '…) and then the desire for science arrived and also the desire for power of the inventor of something, it's a little exhilarating and the opportunity has been given BY TOTALITARIAN DIETS to experiment, we had subjects finally, guinea pigs, human guinea pigs, we could do experiments, they were prisoners, Russians, Jews, sub-men so, we treated them to advance science, they believed! The progress of science has been very questionable, I do not believe there was any fallout from the medical point of view on the other hand the horror was total and certain testimonies of the Nuremberg trial (…) are absolutely poignant of people having lived where the patient says i don't want to be treated and doctor who says it's me who decides you are nothing ! [*] [*] and therefore the Allied Forces Tribunal tried 23 doctors and administrators and sentenced 7 to death by hanging because the reason had to be found. We knew they had had inhuman experiences, but the defense said: beware, they are renowned doctors, it was true; honored by their peers, it was true; known to do useful experiments, it was true; in the past; they acted on orders, it was also true, the Nazis told them to do so in any case the state apparatus told them that it was normal and therefore it was very difficult to condemn them . They were condemned on essentially one thing, THAT IS THAT THEY HAVE IMPOSED THE THERAPEUTIC TEST ON PEOPLE WHO WOULD NOT WANT. They realized at the time of the trial because it was necessary to argue the conviction and sweep the defense and the blunt argument was: " you tried people who didn't want to "And this thing was innovative because it had never been in history and it was so innovative that we created the Nuremberg code, it was the expected judgment that helped develop the theories, allowing to know when research is ethical, when it is compatible with humanity, and when it is not? and this has made the medical association the AMM met in Helzinsky for the first time and gave the basis of what is research. (36 ')

[*] this is why H. does not have to go through these phases, but not the following.
[*] [*] so it hasn't changed! Like the Nazi regime, it is also the regime in place which flouts the ethical right to refuse any therapy and which imposes it for the same reasons as this Nazism by recommending the general interest and reputation doctors practicing the orders coming from the state apparatus and these Nazis obeyed as today, without conscience or human ethics. Nothing new under the sun!

[sen-no-sen]

Sen no sen
for example can we consider this as a conspiracy theory

Can you summarize it?
Because if I have to watch 1 hour of video each time, I can immediately go pro!

[Janic]

Janic wrote:
for example can we consider this as a conspiracy theory

Can you summarize it? The main thing is transcribed above, the first part concerning his experience as a non-conformist surgeon but who ended up being recognized and applied today, and his problems with the order of doctors, no less interesting by the way

Because if I have to watch 1 hour of video each time, I can immediately go pro!

I do, but retirees have time to spend on what they think is important, and life and health are supposed to be part of it.

Plus this from his wife, also a cancer specialist, much more sulfurous ... or conspiracy theory ????

more that, even more worrying:

[sen-no-sen]

[this is what I do, but retirees have time to spend on what they think is important and life and health are supposed to be part of it.

Sorry but I am not retired and I do not think I will be among those who will one day retire!

[Janic]

Janic wrote:
I do, but retirees have time to spend on what they think is important, and life and health are supposed to be part of it.

Sorry but I am not retired and I do not think I will be among those who will one day retire!

I also said that when I started working and the most astonished it was me, to touch it anyway.
I listened to the entire second video and it is particularly worrying for those who do not know how the "health" system works.
But then again would it be paranoia or another conspiracy theory ?!

[Janic]

homeopathy against cholera in haiti.

[Janic]

from the same author
1h02 '
We are here light years away from these monstrous deviations that we still dare to call homeopathy by smearing patients with tons of drugs and which, I do not hesitate to say in public, is the great shame of homeopathic laboratories to have distorted the H. Knowingly, it is a distortion that can be called criminal because by doing this, we have distorted the H. and if you take the concorde, as magnificent as this plane is, if you cut its wings to say I am going to make it a boat you cannot ask yourself if it will work, no it will not work. So this is exactly what happened when laboratories, with the financial powers that this represents, began to teach let's say of the H which was only a sloppy H to rotate the meals, is utterly dismal to see that it all comes down to money.

enough to please opponents ... homeopathic labs

[izentrop]

Defense of homeopathy in the National Assembly: the mark of active lobbying?

Not one of these requests urges the Minister of Health to move towards the end of the management of these products, the effectiveness of which has never been proven. A large number of them, on the contrary, report the "concern of the French" and of certain health professionals faced with this prospect. Sandrine Josso (LREM, Loire-Atlantique) even says that it "would be incomprehensible" for "contributors" to Health Insurance to see this reimbursement removed. These messages are often more than just benevolence for homeopathy. Certain deputies do not hesitate to affirm its effectiveness and in any case its place in the medical arsenal. Marie-Christine Dalloz (Les Républicains, Jura) thus speaks of the “beneficial effects” of homeopathy, while Jean-Carles Grenier (Les Républicains, Sarthe) writes: “It should be remembered that homeopathy is a specificity of medicine and not an alternative. "

... A new manifestation of the gap that can sometimes exist between politics and scientific culture.

https://www.jim.fr/e-docs/defense_de_lh ... _pro.phtml

[Janic]

you should also read the comments from allopathic doctors, having an open mind, of this same article and this one too.

https://www.jim.fr/medecin/actualites/e ... -reactions

[Janic]