If nothing new is bought, what do you see as a replacement activity for the millions of players in the production sector?
This seemingly mundane question * is quite extraordinary if we examine it in the long term: indeed, except under capitalism (whether private or state) it would have aroused the Surprising because of the low regard for work and the evidence that it was opportune and easy to live with or with as little as possible ... What would have appeared as excellent news is perceived §U like a catastrophe under capitalism.
Slavery, which was an ancient solution, is not the cause of this disdain, but its consequence. The first English industrial revolution consisted in transforming the winter and additional weaving work of the peasants into intensive and controlled work (passage of the
domestic system au
factory system, therefore avoid the usual self-limitation of work to the strict necessary ...
The machines have not proven to be substitute slaves due to the reversal of roles ...
Do we not also risk stagnating societies ...
It is a vision very IXX century, which attributes a scale of value between the different cultures with that of the anthropologist as stallion!
* In addition, the very movement of technical innovation inexorably destroys work, which is an internal contradiction ...