Oh la la ... Come on, in order ...
- No, no thorough autopsy can, except in a few rare situations, determine the causes of cancer with certainty.
It is not a matter
which of cancer as if only this pathology should be taken into account!
On the other hand, in the event of collective exposure, as in Chernobyl, a statistical study easily highlights the impact of a phenomenon; also from an influenza epidemic.
Except that when the "sacrificed" to the gnawed, liquefied organs were not statistics of hiding places, but of real humans, in real situation!
And indeed, the Chernobyl situation was quite new for organisms, not "nuclear", but health,
Oh dear ! You take your fantasies for reality. The victims of our explosions in the desert, very far from them did not see pathologies appear (all alike as if by chance), only years later and that the authorities are slowly beginning to recognize.
and made it possible to draw a certain number of lessons on exposure to low doses of radioactivity.
It all depends on what is called low radioactivity. The measurements made greatly exceeded the admissible doses of the time, therefore read the crime of Chernobyl which gives real measurements. The hypocrites considered that if the dose undergone did not exceed the total of an annual, natural irradiation, it is that everything was for the best! So read the Chernobyl crime!
Incidentally, at that time, the USSR was no longer the "Soviet bloc", but a failed state incapable of "filtering the NGOs" ...
That is the only real point in what you say, but despite this bazaar, the sacrificed were indeed removed from the treatment centers so as not to frighten the populations on the spot, as for the consequences of the fatal radiations.
- the "sacrificed" (in reality the "liquidators", who intervened directly on the site) have not all disappeared,
far from it (even if the rapid partition into 3 countries means that we have lost track of the majority),
It's modest and hypocritical formulas! journalists have found their tracks, while the authorities knew exactly who and where the sacrificial had been evacuated. The liquidators were indeed sacrificed automatically! In the absence of anti-radiation suits, they were made to wear protective suits against biological health risks, or even to see nothing (which did not change much.!)
but the 200 that have been followed already allow serious epidemiological studies.
The 200.000 were among the least affected and served as an observation guinea pig (in real size) since there was nothing to cure them and even less cure them.
As for the indirect victims, they were, globally and finely, studied, in particular children, for whom the WHO study provides all the figures (including 15 deaths).
Same thing! There are those who write figures in the distance, on sheets and those who were charcoal, among the victims (not exclusively the immediate dead)
Everything you tell elsewhere (including Corsica) does not appear in any way on statistical studies: nothing in the measurements made allows us to speak of a particular incidence of an attack affecting a particular region. Either you did a study demonstrating the opposite, and you have to provide us with all this, or it is only pure fantasies on your part ...
No wonder, the radioactive cloud had stopped right at the borders, of course! He didn't know it took a passport to cross borders.
-
the populations of the contaminated areas are those who refused to leave, not those who would have returned there;
Some refused to leave
immediately after the explosion because people did not see particular effects on themselves and their children as it is seen during biological epidemics. It's all about dates taken into account.
in the same way, the flora and fauna (which have not been evacuated them) have never been better than since man had left them alone ... No catastrophic decline, no appearance of monsters , not frightening mutations, but a nature which takes back its rights ...
They only came back recently, gradually, but they do not measure their rate of irradiation which gradually decreases by diffusion in the environment, as for the nuclear bombings of Japan. When a territory frees itself from potential enemies, the area is gradually reappropriated (without nuclear involved)
The catastrophist, even apocalyptic, speeches brandished by the anti-nuclear service have proved completely false, even inducing real errors very damaging for all the populations concerned.
What damaging errors? So read the Chernobyl crime which demonstrates the falsehoods of the authorities' assertions trying to reassure the frightened populations.
Faced with such a disaster, the worst attitude to have is to induce panic and catastrophism, ultimately adding to the number of victims due to the disaster itself. The irrational never helped in difficult situations ...
Are you dreaming or what? The latest tsunami did not cause false panic. The catastrophism was verified before their eyes, in their flesh, in their heart, in their soul by the loss of their loved ones and incidentally their property like all disasters elsewhere. You confuse screaming in the fire in a movie theater creating a panic making victims due to it and people who can move easily from point A to point B, without panic or victims. Natural disasters are visible, lethal radiation is invisible, that's all the difference!
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
