Econology wrote:It's all well and good to make a petition to promote the development of centralized energy, but are you sure that this is the right path (assuming that the Z-Machine is not a farce)? Because this development will inevitably come at the expense of other decentralized "renewable" energy and especially energy savings....indeed; pkoi save an "infinite and non-polluting" energy?
So my question: when is a Pantone + HVP petition?
The question is: is it better to make electricity properly by a-neutron fusion (using the principle of the z-machine) or with current fission power plants producing radioactive waste or thermal power plants producing CO2 ?
Believing that fusion power plants will give free energy is wishful thinking. Admittedly, the fuel is not expensive, but the plants are highly technical and must be paid for. On the other hand, the state will be obliged to tax electricity to compensate for the shortfall due to the decrease in fossil fuels. Energy savings and alternative energies will remain on the agenda, especially since power plants can break down or bad weather damage the distribution network, while the sun is not about to break down. .. As for the pantone, it may become essential as long as we use internal combustion engines in the city, unless the electric cars take over faster than expected.
In any case, I don't see why we should leave the use of A-neutron fusion to the military alone.
More research is needed on z-machines in the hope of getting rid of uranium power plants as soon as possible. As for the intelligent use of this energy, it is a question of education.