Cuicui wrote:BobFuck wrote:In fact, it seems not, but I believe in it fairly moderately
Your com is not clear.
I meant "it seems that the CIA (for once) did not participate too much", (with a big doubt).
According to Wikipédo:
The Church report also considered the allegation that the US government involved itself in the 1973 coup:
Was the United States DIRECTLY involved, covertly, in the 1973 coup in Chile? The Committee has found no evidence that it was. [25]
There is no hard evidence of direct US assistance to the coup, despite frequent allegations of such aid. Rather the United States - by its previous actions during Track II, its existing general posture of opposition to Allende, and the nature of its contacts with the Chilean military- probably gave the impression that it would not look with disfavor on a military coup. And US officials in the years before 1973 may not always have succeeded in walking the thin line between monitoring indigenous coup plotting and actually stimulating it. [25]
> Do you still have doubts?
Basically, they admit having funded the military and tried to prevent the election of Allende (among others) but not having participated in the coup.
Seeing how the CIA got wet in South America, it wouldn't be surprising (if you want to laugh, read this book).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_FUBELT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... n_in_Chile
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Condor
But hey, that doesn't change the fact that Allende was a communist vermin, so for once the CIA does something useful
Moderation: calm down with your insults and innuendos bobfuck and respect the political freedom of others!