Rocard: France blessed gods (shale gas)

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
User avatar
elephant
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6646
Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
x 7

Rocard: France blessed gods (shale gas)




by elephant » 12/11/12, 10:22

You know the expression "better to hear that than to be deaf"?
I hope that some will prefer to remain deaf! : Evil:

http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/societe/ ... dieux.html
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16129
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5241




by Remundo » 12/11/12, 11:57

a nuclear pro, a shale gas pro, an autity pro. Really a pro. : Cheesy:
0 x
Image
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 12/11/12, 12:46

And he forgets to say that shale gas wells are perfect for making deep solar thermal geothermal energy, it is perpetual and never exhausted, without CO2 or pollution of groundwater (even depolluting them), to be done instead of shales, polluting them in perpetuity our waters !!!

A functional example since 2007 www.dlsc.ca solar summer geothermal, shallow, to multiply and improve for a low price and jobs.
0 x
Thiazolinones neuro toxic to avoid them being everywhere, madness, killing at least ppm, bacteria and your neurons, which multiplies Alzheimer !!
The bees disappear pesticide, Roundup, and are killing us slowly. http://www.pollinis.org/petitions/petit ... noides.php
User avatar
manet42
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 631
Registration: 22/11/08, 17:40
Location: Lorraine




by manet42 » 12/11/12, 13:58

Given his age and life expectancy, he can eat GMOs and not fear the damage from the exploitation of shale gas. : Lol:
This is the problem of old politicians! .. how can they take action for the future.
When will there be an age limit at the same time as the non-cumulation of mandates?
0 x
Continually trying we finally succeed. So more it fails, the more likely it is that it works.
Other
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 3787
Registration: 17/03/05, 02:35
x 12




by Other » 12/11/12, 15:27

Hello

What I find funny is that politicians or former politicians are promoting shale gas.
Same portrait in Quebec of a well-known former prime minister.
And to say that I voted for him at that time.
Obviously once out of politics, he rallied to the cause of petroleum and denied all of what he said when they were elected.
There is just to trim the commercial that he regularly balances on TV on the economic benefits of the exploitation of the oil sands, If these big oil companies feel obliged to tell the population that what they do is good, there is something to worry about ..
Sometimes I wonder where the barrier is between information and propaganda.

Andre
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14141
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 12/11/12, 19:54

"On this subject, being very green, I abstained for a long time. But I have not read anything that is completely convincing", explains Michel Rocard. According to him, "we have a fantasized reflex a bit of the same type as when dealing with GMOs. When we know that Lacq gas was extracted by hydraulic fracturing without damage on the spot, one wonders (...) For Europe, [France] would be to shale gas what Qatar is to oil. Can we do without? I do not believe that"


Not an expert on the subject but the comparison bothers me. Fracture the rocks at Lacq? Of all the docs I have seen on the internet, even old ones, there is only the word "drilling", especially since at the time, injecting many different toxic chemicals, solvents etc. . to get the gas out, it seems it was not yet invented.

What could have been done (with limited damage?) At the time and with the technology of oil exploration, certainly has nothing to do with the irremediable poisoning of the water tables from hydraulic fracturing and all its " "toxic" adjuvants.

http://www.coeurdebearn.com/decouvrir/B ... ujourd-hui

How much did he still touch Rocroa by the oil lobbies or others, to tell all this bullshit? : Mrgreen:
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 263 guests