Didn't you understand my joke (?)
Neither or a little of both.
Well (and I'm not targeting anyone in particular) but I wonder today, who (?) (As "
independent", manual, intelligent at times, or not for that matter) is not always forced to "change caps" to have to adapt and constantly intervene from the oven to the mill:
- to tinker with his car?
- redo its insulation?
- fit out / move its premises?
- repair equipment when possible?
- do your accounting?
- be a publisher / editor of your ad on your computer?
- and alternatively a photographer?
- manager if we have staff?
- do after-sales and / or marketing and at least know how to take on the task of sales representative?
- stock manager or designer of its offer and / or its products?
- be productive with regard to most of his professional activity and his training (see his profession)?
- also master one or other of the related branches relating to their basic training?
- be an archivist or stock manager?
etc.
In short, these days, who does not de facto have several strings to their bow to get by?
In my opinion, Aérialcastor, Macro and even André - even if we understand their legitimate objections - should not be formalized on the beneficial contradiction which somewhat counter their arguments ...!
We live in a very hard time where burnout, depression, stress and other overwork threaten us.
What would a forum without conflicting opinions? But given the difficulty of the world, it becomes difficult to have constantly in mind "
a fair and balanced look», Our individual concerns quickly make us stigmatize around situations, to make pretexts of conflict. In summary, it would be better to argue around the "matter" and not to attack people! It saddens me to see someone bring multiple names of birds to another, then after about fifteen
"I" /
"me I", to talk about ego problems ... about this "
the other»
Thus, "standing up" is not necessarily a question of ego, but on the contrary a concern for ethics and fairness in the confrontation of ideas.
