Christophe wrote:Remundo wrote:In this sentence, I do not say denigrate Pantone small kit.
If you do not denounce I do not know what it is when you denigrate ... It is on that nothing must be done ...
Speaking of commercial future, the prototypes of your invention is where?
In fact a subject to read about invention: https://www.econologie.com/forums/eolienne-e ... t6022.html
Good reading...
Hi Christopher,
If you want, I can explain a little more ... The Pantone kit sales basically has 2 channels:
1. equipping the vehicle fleet "on the road"
2. the factory equipment, "as original equipment"
However, the "2" is totally blocked ...
And the "1" suffocates ... Because the kits offered do not scientifically demonstrate their real fuel savings. Which must be at 10% of the "manufacturer's consumption", to the fullest.
So, when we propose a kit to 1000 Euro to save 0,5L / 100 km, the return on investment time is unappealing, and not even proven. With the same 1000 Euros, the driver can buy 830 L of diesel and travel 15000 km more in a certain way.
The two sectors are not ready and that's it. However, I would be the first satisfied that a manufacturer looks seriously, at least officially, or that an SME sells kits on reliable bases, in addition to much less random activities.
For the subject, thank you ... I also have a text to post ...
And for the protos, it's getting ready, but slowly ... priority to my little students
@+