TWR a new generation small nuclear reactor

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16129
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5241




by Remundo » 25/03/10, 18:38

But who will want to pay a fissile tax in France?

Already the carbon tax is almost buried, and the renewable energy tariff tends to fall, because it seems too expensive ...

My dear Dédé, I agree with you on the substance, but unfortunately everything is decided in advance on the form. We are going to sink seriously into peak oil, and renewable energies will not prevail immediately because of the dumping of coal, gas ... and nuclear.

No one can roll back nuclear power in France. Only peak uranium will calm things down in 30 or 50 years.

The accidents and waste management you speak of are the last concerns of the leaders of the sector. They provide a minimum service in this area: a few large swimming pools, a few small caves in the basements, average plant security just to ensure production and after them the flood. : Idea:

PS: if you try to insist on a sentence, put it in bold and / or in color, it will already be quite busy.

Kind regards.
0 x
Image
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6980
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2905




by gegyx » 25/03/10, 19:02

When you have highlighted and then selected size "large",

In front of your enlargement there is [size = 18]

Well, instead of 18, you put 14, or 15 or 16 ...
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749




by sen-no-sen » 25/03/10, 19:03

Remundo wrote:
No one can roll back nuclear power in France. Only peak uranium will calm things down in 30 or 50 years.


Kind regards.


Never mind! as this dear Claude Allègre said, the future is generation 4 (breeder reactors which will operate on Thorium with reserves for several centuries !!!).
In nuclear power, they plan for the long term, except for their waste!
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 25/03/10, 19:55

Thank you for the answer !!
Thanks I'm going too fast, not nitpicking enough and a little lazy out of habit of sizes in the drop down menu. It would be good to set large to 14 by default !! (size14)

The nuclear disaster, as for OGM (we discover on TV (arte) at the moment a century later after their discovery that the trans fatty acids are very dangerous and kill, yet very harmless and hyperstable next to GMOs), will arrive faster than we would like and will stop nuclear power, more than with Chernobyl !!

We must insist on the insurance tax on all pollution (not only CO2) on a global scale to protect against future human and natural disasters, (already to be claimed by environmentalists).
We have indeed invented the income tax and abolished the one on windows, created maldie insurance, fuel taxes, etc ...
!!
Even for earthquakes it would be useful as well as to compensate Bangladesh submerged by our CO2 (not proven) but it would be useful to create a world insurance in provision of all catastrophes !!!
Past utopias have become real !!
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749




by sen-no-sen » 25/03/10, 20:10

There is indeed an insurance for nuclear (among others), it seems to me, COFACE: The French Company for the Insurance of Foreign Trade, which "insures" industrial contracts for export in unstable countries *
* insurance financed by public funds: therefore it is we who pay!
0 x
User avatar
swift2540
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 383
Registration: 04/08/08, 00:48
Location: Liege
x 1




by swift2540 » 26/03/10, 01:37

0 x
Sometimes it is better to stop, reflect, and ask the right questions ...
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16129
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5241




by Remundo » 26/03/10, 13:51

sen-no-sen wrote:
Remundo wrote:
No one can roll back nuclear power in France. Only peak uranium will calm things down in 30 or 50 years.


Kind regards.


Never mind! as this dear Claude Allègre said, the future is generation 4 (breeder reactors which will operate on Thorium with reserves for several centuries !!!).
In nuclear power, they plan for the long term, except for their waste!

Indeed, breeding is salivating. it is not yet fully developed, but it could be.

It does not solve the problem of waste and proliferation, which are the 2 big warts in the industry.

@+
0 x
Image

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Google [Bot] and 394 guests