Post dedicated to the "bravery" pieces of our brightest EGOtrolls:
kouillon wrote:my dear XXXXXXXXX (censored), very simple-minded as you are judging by the extreme mediocrity of your interventions that I could read on other subjects, know that there is not a shadow of the most tiny draft of proof in what I have been able to write so far! I can not help but smile when I saw that you could see evidence here, that explains the why of how we can attend a forum titled "Surunitary engines or processes, debate and ideas?" with the diligence that is yours! You are a big naive who wants to take anyone's word for it, and the very concept of proof must escape you completely!
All I have been able to do here is called popularization! And by reading better, you would have even seen that I clarified the uncertain nature of this theory.
So who knows, maybe the standard model will fall apart against another, maybe it will be confirmed, but the fact is that when I am asked a question about spin, I put it in context: physics quantum itself component of the standard model!
Finally, allow me to renew the expression of my contempt that in the face of a discipline producing no formulation, no demonstration and never having convincing results outside of experience where the very protocol was flawed.