Hello,
To store even more hydrogen, researchers have thought of electrolysis of urine much less energy-consuming than that of water!
View:
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/07/0 ... power.html
Obelix
Save the planet with the H2: pee in the jar
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79330
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11046
Other source:
http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/ ... 070902.asp
I'm going to have to drink beer ...
http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/ ... 070902.asp
I'm going to have to drink beer ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 865
- Registration: 10/05/09, 16:39
- x 21
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
At the beginning, I said to myself: yeah, we're going to put pampers in the cows to recover the p ... . Not very practical, but:
in fact, it can be recovered in stables and pigsties
at highway stations. (provided you put the famous urinals without water)
I no longer have my electrolyser with which I did some tests two years ago, but I will do some tests: if it is true that we can electrolyze urine at 0,37 V instead of 1,23 , 3,5 V, multiple cells could be 4 to XNUMX times more efficient.
in fact, it can be recovered in stables and pigsties
at highway stations. (provided you put the famous urinals without water)
I no longer have my electrolyser with which I did some tests two years ago, but I will do some tests: if it is true that we can electrolyze urine at 0,37 V instead of 1,23 , 3,5 V, multiple cells could be 4 to XNUMX times more efficient.
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
With such efficiency, would the utopian water car become the piss car? We get closer to the sperm car
For those who don't know
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r6GHgU7HiY
Would we have the same olfactory drawback?
On the other hand, now, it will be out of the question that I still give 30cents to Madame pee. It’s still not going to sweeten twice.
That said, if urine is so promising, why not, energy is almost in everything. And especially in what we throw away.
Good news for those who wanted improved electrolysis.
For those who don't know
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r6GHgU7HiY
Would we have the same olfactory drawback?
On the other hand, now, it will be out of the question that I still give 30cents to Madame pee. It’s still not going to sweeten twice.
That said, if urine is so promising, why not, energy is almost in everything. And especially in what we throw away.
Good news for those who wanted improved electrolysis.
0 x
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
Baby bear said:
Make gold with m ....! What a dream !
That said, if urine is so promising, why not, energy is almost in everything. And especially in what we throw away.
Good news for those who wanted improved electrolysis.
Make gold with m ....! What a dream !
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
elephant wrote:Make gold with m ....! What a dream !
In fact, it is rather we who make shit with gold. And not just for waste.
Example
Mobile phones and sms are terribly effective ways of contacting an individual wherever they are ...
We send "down" to 6969 to receive pictures of girls without panties.
0 x
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
I have already heard of very low electrolysis voltage with ammonia
it is not a miracle: ammonia gas is a fuel: it is not surprising that its energy facilitates the formation of hydrogen
distilling the piss to isolate the ammonia would be expensive in energy: if we can directly electrolyze it why not
in English urea means urea: it is a pure chemical compound and not urine
be careful urine is mostly water with a little urea and other piggy in it
urine will never be a fuel to put in the car: it's 95% water
electrolyzing urine will be rather a gadget to put next to the toilet to make a little bit of hydrogen
it is not a miracle: ammonia gas is a fuel: it is not surprising that its energy facilitates the formation of hydrogen
distilling the piss to isolate the ammonia would be expensive in energy: if we can directly electrolyze it why not
in English urea means urea: it is a pure chemical compound and not urine
be careful urine is mostly water with a little urea and other piggy in it
urine will never be a fuel to put in the car: it's 95% water
electrolyzing urine will be rather a gadget to put next to the toilet to make a little bit of hydrogen
Last edited by chatelot16 the 12 / 07 / 09, 16: 17, 2 edited once.
0 x
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 278 guests