EELV controversy on aviation and children's dreams (Mayor of Poitiers)

Transport and new transport: energy, pollution, engine innovations, concept car, hybrid vehicles, prototypes, pollution control, emission standards, tax. not individual transport modes: transport, organization, carsharing or carpooling. Transport without or with less oil.
User avatar
thibr
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 619
Registration: 07/01/18, 09:19
x 212

EELV controversy on aviation and children's dreams (Mayor of Poitiers)




by thibr » 04/04/21, 09:49


The EELV mayor of Poitiers will cut aid to everything that flies, including gliders and electric model aircraft clubs. Worse, we have to control our children's dreams and stealing should no longer be a part of them. Political ecology does not fight against pollution but against what flies, this sectarianism must stop.



good debate : Wink: you have 2 hours : Mrgreen:
1 x

User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3850
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 272

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by Macro » 04/04/21, 11:13

Well here it is ... we are moving forward : Cheesy: : Cheesy:
1 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6607
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 573

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by sen-no-sen » 04/04/21, 12:17

An example of punitive ecology ... as a reminder in France there are around 5800 tourist planes (excluding microlights) ... against a land vehicle fleet of nearly 39 million vehicles, look for the error ... and the priorities!
It is on the same level as wanting to tackle the Tour de France or the July 14 military parade for ecological reasons! : Lol:
However, reducing electro-nuclear production by 25% to replace it with "back up" gas-fired wind power during high pressure periods does not seem to bother EELV too much ... : roll:
1 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 7012
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 311

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by ABC2019 » 04/04/21, 12:21

we also removed Christmas trees ... the important thing is to show that we drool over them, that's how we deserve Heaven !!
1 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2669
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 729

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 04/04/21, 13:24

Another lot of real assholes who present themselves under a "green" label. : Evil:
0 x
"It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on smart things. The most serious disease of the brain is to think." (J.Rouxel) "No?" © "By definition the cause is the product of the effect" "There is absolutely nothing to do about the climate". (Truyphion)

User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 58373
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 2240

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by Christophe » 04/04/21, 14:04

Get out of the way pov asshole!
1 x
Ce forum helped you? Help him too so that he can continue helping others - For good exchanges between members - Publish an article on Econology and Google News
User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 58373
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 2240

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by Christophe » 04/04/21, 14:07

sen-no-sen wrote:An example of punitive ecology ... as a reminder in France there are around 5800 tourist planes (excluding microlights) ... against a land vehicle fleet of nearly 39 million vehicles, look for the error ... and the priorities!
It is on the same level as wanting to tackle the Tour de France or the July 14 military parade for ecological reasons! : Lol:
However, reducing electro-nuclear production by 25% to replace it with "back up" gas-fired wind power during high pressure periods does not seem to bother EELV too much ... : roll:


That's the whole problem of political ecologists ... ignoramuses who brandish ecology without any baggage, neither technical nor scientific ... just mental rants ...

Exactly like the tocard Belgian ecologists who passed all of Brussels in zone 30 ...

: Lol: : Lol: : Lol:
0 x
Ce forum helped you? Help him too so that he can continue helping others - For good exchanges between members - Publish an article on Econology and Google News
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9763
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 1121

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by Ahmed » 04/04/21, 20:56

It is not a problem of ignardiousness (sic), but of conformity with the society of the spectacle: they are sellers of powder in the eyes, just like their non-green colleagues besides. They must therefore find fields of action of a symbolic nature.

I must underline that the title of this subject brings together two categories which are nevertheless quite separate: well before the "conquest" of the moon, I often stayed there, according to my teachers themselves (whose competence cannot be questioned! ) and yet I have no appetite for real aeronautical configurations: my imagination is more than enough for me!
2 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2669
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 729

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 04/04/21, 20:59

Wanting to prevent children from dreaming about anything, even bullshit is a bad "symbol".
0 x
"It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on smart things. The most serious disease of the brain is to think." (J.Rouxel) "No?" © "By definition the cause is the product of the effect" "There is absolutely nothing to do about the climate". (Truyphion)
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3850
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 272

Re: POLEMIC ON THE AIR AND CHILDREN'S DREAMS




by Macro » 05/04/21, 08:34

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Wanting to prevent children from dreaming about anything, even bullshit is a bad "symbol".


It is not in my humble opinion a story of bad symbol ... It is quite simply a stupid idea .... Unrealizable ... to take control of another's dreams .... has good ... But it's good that she continues to do her bad clown show ....
1 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...


Back to "New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Majestic-12 [Bot] and 11 guests