The GreenBox trap pollution: CO2, NOx?

Transport and new transport: energy, pollution, engine innovations, concept car, hybrid vehicles, prototypes, pollution control, emission standards, tax. not individual transport modes: transport, organization, carsharing or carpooling. Transport without or with less oil.
User avatar
Gregconstruct
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1781
Registration: 07/11/07, 19:55
Location: Amay Belgium




by Gregconstruct » 03/10/08, 12:00

It seems to me that whatever the reagent, it would take considerable amounts to be effective.

Thank you for lighting my lantern my dear Jon.

Greetings
0 x
Every action counts for our planet !!!
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16178
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5263




by Remundo » 03/10/08, 14:51

Hello everyone,

CO2 sequestration and / or sequestration are energy-consuming, expensive and not perfect technologies.

The best CO2 trap is not to produce it : Idea:
0 x
Image
User avatar
Gregconstruct
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1781
Registration: 07/11/07, 19:55
Location: Amay Belgium




by Gregconstruct » 06/10/08, 13:29

I suspected it a bit considering the mess it takes to trap 3 grams of CO2 ... :|
0 x
Every action counts for our planet !!!

Back to "New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 270 guests