city 30 wrote:if you find me a serious argument against the concept of city 30 I pay you a foam!
Chick? A Kronenbourg I hope huh?
The serious arguments (I think) I said them above: risk of increasing congestion during peak hours (a car traveling at 30 will stay longer on the road) ... and pollution: a car pollutes more at 30km / h than at 50 (at steady speed) .. .
Now obviously it depends on what you call "Transit axis"?
For example: avenue des vosges or quai Louis Pasteur in Strasbourg: 50 or 30?
Is there a public plan that defines the (future) 30 zones in Strasbourg somewhere?
Here is that of Lorient: https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... WQ1fj9.pdf
Ah well in this case I am already more in agreement with the concept: the "major" axes remain at 50 (= 60-70 in reality hihihi)
The difference is that there has been a progression over 3 years, I don't know if stras wants to do the same ...