hello Elephant,
I wanted to know where you are in your attempt to replicate Meyer.
Have you persevered. Results ?
Have you also tried other methods (like Bob Boyce)?
Thank you for your answer.
To finish with Stanley Meyer ...
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
I have carried out documentation work and put forward hypotheses, in particular in the light of work on the Ni-H reaction (Rossi, Foccardi and the others) because I come to the conclusion that everything is there:
- surface of the "prepared" cathode
- HV pulse parameters
- voluntary omissions in the patent (eg isolated anode)
Either the Meyer reaction exists and it is something close to what happens in the Ni-H reaction and indeed, you have to "know a certain number of things" to trigger it, because it is not systematic.
Either it's can
I did some tests with a generator and a burner transformer: no bubbles and even deionized water behaves in short circuit
For the rest, I have other irons in the fire
- surface of the "prepared" cathode
- HV pulse parameters
- voluntary omissions in the patent (eg isolated anode)
Either the Meyer reaction exists and it is something close to what happens in the Ni-H reaction and indeed, you have to "know a certain number of things" to trigger it, because it is not systematic.
Either it's can
I did some tests with a generator and a burner transformer: no bubbles and even deionized water behaves in short circuit
For the rest, I have other irons in the fire
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
Well, since Meyer seems difficult to answer given the lack of information, has anyone tried Bob Boyce's method?
At least there, he gives all the useful information, and above all he claims to produce gas up to 1200% of Faraday.
Has anyone tried? Seriously?
All info on his method can be found on the free-energy-info.co.uk website. They are particularly detailed and leave no room for guesswork.
thank you to all of you
At least there, he gives all the useful information, and above all he claims to produce gas up to 1200% of Faraday.
Has anyone tried? Seriously?
All info on his method can be found on the free-energy-info.co.uk website. They are particularly detailed and leave no room for guesswork.
thank you to all of you
0 x
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
You give Patrick Keelly great credit!
His book is superb, but it's only a compilation! If everything he said worked, it would have been a long time since the emirs begged in the streets.
So try if it seems so easy!
His book is superb, but it's only a compilation! If everything he said worked, it would have been a long time since the emirs begged in the streets.
So try if it seems so easy!
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
And let's not forget one thing (which I already said). SM didn't say EVERYTHING in its patent.
In particular, on the photo of his buggy, we clearly see a reactor which must certainly be able to resist 20-30 atmospheres: conditions of an electrolysis with improved efficiency or sufficient storage for the demo?
We should not forget either that it is a whole fuel ionization technology that he developed.
In particular, on the photo of his buggy, we clearly see a reactor which must certainly be able to resist 20-30 atmospheres: conditions of an electrolysis with improved efficiency or sufficient storage for the demo?
We should not forget either that it is a whole fuel ionization technology that he developed.
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
no, Elephant, I never said that it would be easy, and especially not for me ... my technical skills are limited.
On the other hand, the article which concerns him seemed to me well documented, without "hidden parts". It also details the tricky parts and tells us which ones require a "custom" focus.
That's why I asked if someone tried to reproduce their generator.
Kind regards.
On the other hand, the article which concerns him seemed to me well documented, without "hidden parts". It also details the tricky parts and tells us which ones require a "custom" focus.
That's why I asked if someone tried to reproduce their generator.
Kind regards.
0 x
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
Courage! While visiting one of my ironworker's customers, I found a small quantity of stainless steel tube, I will finally be able to try!
resonating acoustically (they have a nice sound! )
conditioned with Ravi or Bob Boyce
resonating acoustically (they have a nice sound! )
conditioned with Ravi or Bob Boyce
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
I have little time to devote to it and for the moment my attention is focused on the e-cat.
I found superb stainless steel tubes, I need to redo a test cell.
My impression is always the same:
electrolysis with "conditioned" stainless steel and Focardi-Rossi-Piantelli-Pirelli-Tutti Quanti reaction = same fight.
It won't surprise me that the original Meyer electrolyser works under pressure, if you watch the Meyer Buggy movies you will see a "pot" in it that I think should withstand at least 10-15 bar. If it had worked at P atm, a simple "Tupperware" would have been enough.
And that, he did not have to specify it in his patent for it to be valid.
But then, if it is the case .... I am not equipped.
I found superb stainless steel tubes, I need to redo a test cell.
My impression is always the same:
electrolysis with "conditioned" stainless steel and Focardi-Rossi-Piantelli-Pirelli-Tutti Quanti reaction = same fight.
It won't surprise me that the original Meyer electrolyser works under pressure, if you watch the Meyer Buggy movies you will see a "pot" in it that I think should withstand at least 10-15 bar. If it had worked at P atm, a simple "Tupperware" would have been enough.
And that, he did not have to specify it in his patent for it to be valid.
But then, if it is the case .... I am not equipped.
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 30 Replies
- 16701 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
04/06/21, 15:37A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
-
- 4 Replies
- 3083 views
-
Last message by Petrus
View the latest post
17/08/19, 16:49A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
-
- 4 Replies
- 3640 views
-
Last message by Verna
View the latest post
13/08/19, 11:40A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
-
- 23 Replies
- 9368 views
-
Last message by Adrien (ex-nico239)
View the latest post
19/02/19, 15:21A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
-
- 25 Replies
- 23831 views
-
Last message by Philippe Schutt
View the latest post
08/09/16, 13:23A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
Back to "New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 133 guests