dede2002 wrote:These are rough calculations, in which you will have to include temperatures and pressure, neither am I a specialist in thermodynamics ...
https://www.econologie.com/forums/dopage-mot ... t4883.html
dede2002 wrote:These are rough calculations, in which you will have to include temperatures and pressure, neither am I a specialist in thermodynamics ...
dede2002 wrote:The best engines before the catalyst era produced less than 2% toxicants (0.5% CO), not sure a "decatalyzed" catalyst engine would do the same.
Hence the importance of taking measurements with and without catalytic converter, and with and without pantone. And to be able to do "better than the catalyst", or at least be sure not to produce CO at idle speed.
Otherwise you will have to keep the catalyst!
Christophe wrote:dede2002 wrote:These are rough calculations, in which you will have to include temperatures and pressure, neither am I a specialist in thermodynamics ...
https://www.econologie.com/forums/dopage-mot ... t4883.html
dede2002 wrote:Flytox, I do not think that the back pressure of the catalyst is very significant, and it can be compensated by that of the reactor, or by reducing the section.
Some vehicles (WV for example) have a measurement before the catalytic converter accessible under the hood, and control / adjustment values before / after.
example:
Or analyze everything that leaves the reactor in operation, without connecting it to the intake?
Back to "New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ..."
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 223 guests