The idea of mixing "science and religion" is very honest, but it is not new. In the 70s "it was taboo. Today it is obvious and common!
Do we have to repeat it again:
Obamot wrote:It is not because something is not scientific, that it is proof that it exists
To admit it around the obscure, unproven theories of the supreme order of the temple of the lemurs (lol) and other voodoo groups, it would still be necessary for this sort of terrain of challenge against "official science" which seems to be the "dialectical business" of some (s), does not turn into joyful intellectual masturbation.
You will repeat me a hundred times:
Obamot wrote:being pragmatic does not prevent being a believer!
... Make concrete experiences and publish them. I will be the first to support them!
In your place, I would look on the side of Asia, there they are way ahead of us in the field ... And with animists, it is absolutely certain that you would not be looked at askance.
Okay, this time I'm going to bed: GOOD NIGHT!