Christophe wrote:GuyGadebois wrote:After that, which is limited to 110 around cities and in the suburbs, why not, because of noise pollution. Afterwards, everywhere else, 120 seems to me a good compromise.
This has already been the case for years: the periphery of Strasbourg is at 70 km / h !! There is even an area at 50 !!
50 on a perif, at first glance it may seem ridiculous, unless it is well done and allows a regulation of the flow allowing not to clog the city when one leaves it. But it requires an efficient PC like in Geneva, for example. I don't know how it works in Strasbourg.
In Switzerland, speeds are regulated according to the flow from motorways to cities. On the highway, the speed changes in real time on the electronic panels and in town the red lights are also regulated according to traffic. It's not perfect, but it's better than elsewhere where we go from 130 (or 110) to 50 in a few hundred meters, which does not fail to cause a good number of traffic jams.
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)