coucou789456 wrote:
but also having a C5 V6 petrol, I can immediately see the interest of your post.
jeff
The typical example of a car to equip !!!
I have the 2.0 l. Mixed manufacturer consumption: 8,5 l / 100 I believe.
I make about 8 liters of petrol (equivalent - depending on my on-board computer).
I consume around 10 liters of LPG, which is an excess consumption of 20%. This is the "high" standard usually given. We are talking about + 10 to + 20% ... LPG is less "dense" in energy than gasoline. There is more hydrogen and less C. So 1 l of LPG "contains" less energy than 1 l of gasoline (itself less energetic than a liter of diesel).
As stated in a discussion elsewhere, this is not a break! We stay on fossil. We keep putting CO² in a mess. But much less CO (10 times less), almost more particles (compared to Diesel but FAP!), Less NOx ...
As indicated in an exchange with Citro, by equipping a C1, I arrive at lower emissions than those of a Prius for a price 3 times lower!
It is therefore necessary to combine the "downsizing" (living with things smaller and less greedy - without criticizing yourself, you started badly with your V6 !!! I also let myself be caught by an "excellent opportunity": a C5 great -equipped - all options - sold by a grandpa at 23 km for 000 €) and LPG and we can arrive at an affordable price at an acceptable solution (or "less worse") ... This is the meaning of my message ...