Chemtrails and contrails, what's the difference?

Transport and new transport: energy, pollution, engine innovations, concept car, hybrid vehicles, prototypes, pollution control, emission standards, tax. not individual transport modes: transport, organization, carsharing or carpooling. Transport without or with less oil.
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16129
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5241




by Remundo » 24/05/14, 10:05

he also raises questions from his constituents.

It's always good to ask questions ...
0 x
Image
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554




by moinsdewatt » 12/08/14, 21:06

Good article in Le Monde

Chemtrails, a persistent climate-conspiratorial hoax

Monday August 11, 2014, by Audrey Garric


We see them every day streaking the sky: for the majority of us, the contrails that appear in the wake of airplanes are nothing but water vapor. But in conspiratorial circles, as well as - it must be admitted - among some environmentalists or left activists, these traces would rather be evidence of chemicals deliberately spread at high altitudes by various government and military agencies which seek to modify the climate and manipulate populations. So what about it?


Where does the conspiracy theory of chemtrails come from?

..................

.................
How to break this stubborn myth? "There is no serious, scientific evidence that the US government is running such a program. And no one has ever seen tanks of harmful chemicals loaded on planes at airports," says Alan Robock, professor of climatology at Rutgers University in New Jersey. But I don't know how to prove that there is no secret conspiracy if people want to believe it. It is impossible to prove that something does not exist. "
.............

If we see more streaks, it is mainly because of the continuous increase in air traffic for half a century. Passengers rose from 108 million in 1960 to 1 billion in the early 1990s and to 3,1 billion in 2013, or 33 million flights, according to figures from the International Civil Aviation Organization.

As for the so-called traces of aluminum, barium or other toxic products, the excellent demystification site Contrail Science was responsible for producing counter-arguments. For example, he obtained the expert report from the laboratory mandated for the documentary Why in the world are they spraying? (mentioned above). Result: the film's authors did not analyze rainwater but mud where it is natural to find aluminum. Remember that aluminum is the most abundant metal in the earth's crust (around 8%) and that it is found everywhere, in food, packaging, transport, construction, etc. Nothing abnormal, therefore, and especially nothing that proves that it was deliberately spread, despite what conspirators believe.

Audrey Garric

http://ecologie.blog.lemonde.fr/2014/08 ... ersistant/
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 14/08/14, 22:28

Some believe that chemtrails exist, others that they do not exist. To each his beliefs.
0 x
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6980
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2905




by gegyx » 09/10/14, 20:01

You have to know how to listen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQAwcrODu8w#
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11042




by Christophe » 09/10/14, 20:59

I listened, it still didn't convince me that each plane did chemtrails ...

The former pilot (at the beginning) who said that before there was no condensation residue ... er how to explain this then?

https://www.econologie.com/forums/post69084.html#69084

Image

After yes there are (occasional?) "Chemical" spreading tests ...
0 x
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6980
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2905




by gegyx » 09/10/14, 21:13

:D

What was in kerosene at the time?

Still a few more particles?
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11042




by Christophe » 09/10/14, 21:17

There was no kerosene since they were piston engines ...

So gasoline (not very good quality: 70 octane ...)
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11042




by Christophe » 10/10/14, 12:37

0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11042




by Christophe » 11/10/14, 14:26

For your social networks:

Image
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 11/10/14, 20:41

Christophe wrote:For your social networks:
Image
Note that these contrails are not very persistent, compare with the chemtrails that can persist for a whole day.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 302 guests