former oceanic wrote:The annual penalty, there was 10 years ago ... It was the car sticker.
That's true. We could discuss "progressivity" based on fiscal power, which is not perfectly linked to emissions ...
With the vignette, there was no bonus. Result: everyone was against it. Result: it has been deleted. Remember that originally it was created for the retirement of the old!
I think a system of bonus-malus is more interesting (than the sticker) to encourage people to buy small vehicles: even if the 700 € represent little in the overall cost of a vehicle over its lifetime, although, as I wrote above, the consumer is not so rational, it is clear that people bite the hook!
I think it would have been even more effective if it were annual - but still a bonus-malus.
I am for the system - even if as a used buyer, I do not benefit from it. The role of the state is to regulate markets. So steer vesr of spetites cars at the expense of big seems to me a wise measure, in the current context.
To judge the relevance, it would be necessary to know how much represents the total of the bonuses and how much the total of the penalties. And compare that to "200 million". That in the context of a project, of something new, we are wrong by 10 or 20%, it's extremely banal, even in the private (ask Airbus where they are with the A 380 or Boeing with the Dreamliner, or Renault how much they pledge with the Velsatis or avce the Avantime!). I write again: to be safe, the safest is to do nothing ... Except that we go in the wall.
I fear that after a period of implementation where everyone talks about it, it does not fall ...
