Reviews of motor scouring cleaning products: bardahl, spheretech, facom ...

[Christophe]

I didn't even have to dig through my paper archives (whew !!), however I found one and it's 150 km please (for a 000 bike, it's a lot a lot ^ ^) http://xavier26.free.fr/cb500/php_pages ... 000_km.php

Moto-Revue-3462-Honda-Cbr-600-F-Cb.jpg (42.26 KB) Viewed 7539 times

This one dates from ... 2001 ... already! I think this custom, given the evolution of society, no longer exists at Moto Revue!

It is this kind of comparative dismantling that we must rigorously expect from the long-term comparison on Premium fuels!

[Christophe]

Well, look better

The 1er link is not necessarily the best (quite the contrary ...)

I know but I'm preparing dinner ...

Have you finished eating?

[GuyGadebois]

(Broââps ...!)
https://www.lefigaro.fr/automobile/2008 ... lleur-.php

[GuyGadebois]

Well, look better

The 1er link is not necessarily the best (quite the contrary ...)

I know but I'm preparing dinner ...

Have you finished eating?

Yep, but I did not find much. So good ... Everyone will do what he wants.

[Christophe]

(Broââps ...!)
https://www.lefigaro.fr/automobile/2008 ... lleur-.php

That's what I thought

The results are, to say the least, instructive (www.autoplus.fr). It is not the premium fuels, yet put forward by the tankers, who win the highest prices in terms of consumption and economy. Another lesson: no brand is consistent from one type of fuel to another.

(...)

For diesel, it is again the fuel Leclerc (1,25 € / l) which is placed on the top step of the podium with 9,20 € / 100 km. Interestingly, the four Premiums are the most expensive to buy (with the standard of Total) and use. The Super Diesel (1,38 € / l) Casino at 14e and last place with 10,50 € for 100 km.

Conclusion of our colleagues, which we share: "The best economizer? It's you ! "

Mouahaha!

Good more consumption for Premiums may not mean more clogging ... or not!

[Christophe]

Yep, but I did not find much. So good ... Everyone will do what he wants.

Perseverance!!

[GuyGadebois]

Conclusion of our colleagues, which we share: "The best economizer? It's you ! "

2008 anyway ...

[Christophe]

2008 anyway ...

So What? Do you think the excellium has fundamentally changed since then?

Hold your 1st article looks a lot like the brochure for the Excellium

NO CONCRETE NUMBER IN THE TESTIMONIALS ... in short, it is on the level of the good-natured salesman!

Scientifically Totally unacceptable!

[Christophe]

Seriously it's caricatural!

"I noticed a decrease in my fuel consumption! I would definitely recommend it."

The substance and the form of a false testimony ... as we read millions on the net!

"Aware that good behavior behind the wheel can have a positive impact on fuel consumption, we are now deploying tools to educate our traveling employees about energy efficient driving"

Eco driving has nothing to do with excellium!

"To empower my teams, I have therefore made eco-driving and the use of TOTAL EXCELLIUM a real watchword. The results are there!"

Which results? %? Encryption?

"Our employees now have dedicated access to monitoring their fuel consumption, for optimized driving!"

More eco-driving ...

[Christophe]

No other opinion ??? There are, however, a lot of mechanics here!