Janic wrote:
the State must pass on the drop on one side to the increase on the other if it does not want to lose its taxes.
I think if it was, it would be better accepted.
What promises is that the diesel loses its tax advantage: therefore the diesel will increase to catch up with, and even exceed a little, petrol [we run out of diesel, we have too much petrol; so it would be logical that taxes aside, gasoline is less expensive; so if the government aligns the diesel tax on petrol, diesel will be slightly more expensive]
I haven't heard much about "going down one side ..." lately. Have you read / heard anything along these lines?
[Me, personally, I am for the catching up. I bazardés my Diesel 5 years ago already, when I started to dig the question of particles in connection with ... my pellet boiler ... And that I then discovered this problem which we begin to speak today, no doubt very timely in relation to a tax deposit: it is easier to announce increased taxation when justified by public health]