The chemistry is better than alchemy!

[comode]

[that

I ask nothing better, go ahead, we read you!
...

why so aggressive ???

you can't prove to me that there are at least two testatica machines that produce electricity (between 200 and 1000 watt)

I am not aggressive, on the contrary, I invite you to continue your resonance ...

I am attentive...

I see that you were well launched, and I would especially not want to cut you off when you were going to expose your evidence ...

But to answer your question, no, I can not prove to you that there are 2 testatica machines since I do not even know what it is ... And I have to confess why you ask me that ...

But let's move on, and pick up where you left off ...

You had to tell me about inconsistencies in the article on the clocks, and you were going to bring me proof on those that you said you had cited (which you did not do anyway) ...

(I insist, but I would like really that you give me your definition of proof.)

EDIT: you edited while I was writing ... your link to the forum contains the same problem as everything else ... ABSOLUTELY NOTHING is verifiable ... No protocol description, no result ... Just plans ...

Edit 2: Oh, méa culpa, there's an explanation that I had not seen ... I read it ...
Do not hesitate to detail your thoughts in the meantime ... there are a lot of outstanding questions

[Tagor]

who ?

paul sprain's magnetic motor provides electricity
it was checked by hatiberlin admin from forum overunity.com
who signed an NDA if you want proof you must also sign the NDA

thane bi toroid, eh, will soon be marketed after
3 years of research (it prevents the law of lenz from applying)
he published all the details here
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topi ... #msg124655

the hilden brandt engine has been checked by an independent person
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topi ... #msg124655

[Tagor]

[you can't prove to me that there are at least two testatica machines that produce electricity (between 200 and 1000 watt)

I corrected

<<

you cannot prove to me that there are not at least two testatica machines which produce electricity (between 200 and 1000 watt)

>>


some of these machines produced 2 or 3 kW
I said 2 for safety but there are probably at least 3 of which

one which will be bought by a group of researchers in order to publish
all the details of its construction

moray devices have produced more than 4kW, I have a book which reproduces the certificates of the proper functioning of its devices ...

the evidence ?

many photos of many assemblies with a
good dozen scientists

[Gregconstruct]

Yes, it's not convenient, is it?

You have already done better as a valve to ground me the leather

[Gregconstruct]

Radiolysis?

I only know Radiohead ...

[Tagor]

The chemistry is better than alchemy!

can you explain this title?

for now we are talking about everything except chemistry / alchemy!
is this volunteer?

if I am not mistaken on the subject ...

JP BIBERIAN, researcher at CNRS ...
working on cold fusion ...
passionate about transmutations
and by consequence to alchemy


so, it seems to me ...
if you have real questions on the subject
this researcher will answer you without problem
he is someone very open and competent ...

[comode]

Ok tagor ...

One question at a time I see ...

Can you give me what you consider to be the definition of evidence?

[wirbelwind262]

Hello everyone
comode looks a bit like the engineer who sees only through the "sacrosanct" thermodynamics .....
fortunately there is not only that ....
what are you trying to prove convenient?
good luck

[comode]

can you explain this title?

for now we are talking about everything except chemistry / alchemy!
is this volunteer?

You have to understand that these are different approaches!

try to reproduce and reproduce again and again the same experiences without knowing why until one day falling on the right result, that is EXACTLY the concept of alchemy ...

In anticipation of what comes next, concerning what may have been said about certain science and life, if you have read 1040, there is no question of alchemy ... The title refers to the fact that we see a theoretical possibility which may be scientifically provable, the century or centuries of alchemy have produced nothing. So it's basically a gait problem.

[Gregconstruct]

Can you give me what you consider to be the definition of evidence?

Aaaaaaaaaaah ... But what is a definition first?

Do you really believe that a definition is something to stop ???
Things are evolving! Progress itself is based on the mistakes of the past. This means that what is evidence today may no longer be tomorrow.
Things are changing and fortunately, because otherwise, the earth would always be flat and we would still be in a geocentric system !!!

In my humble opinion (yes, I sometimes know how to be humble), alchemy is a term foure tout which wants both to say everything and its opposite.
So no headache for vocabulary!