Macro wrote:[A car driven by many hands in completely different circumstances can not be taken as a serious or at least concrete reference ... It remains my opinion ...
Let's admit for the consumption, but for measures pollution?
nlc wrote:but damn it is not about water engine, but doping, it has nothing to do
Macro wrote:The measurements of the opacities at an instant T engine without load are alas well can be representative of the real pollution of a car all along the road ...
Macro wrote:... All you need is a man who walks his 5-liter jerry can in the trunk and who fills up every time he fills up with the 306 ... Like the man he thinks he heats up at behind ... The 306 it starts to consume much less ....
Macro wrote:I would like to believe that I am a pure and simple slanderer ....
I'm just a little responsible in a French box I can just tell you that we are not dealing with teddy bears ....
pb2488 wrote:Is "k" just an opacity index?
How are CO2 emissions measured and are they related to opacity?
Macro wrote:The measurements of the opacities at an instant T engine without load are alas well can be representative of the real pollution of a car all along the road ...
Christophe wrote:Macro wrote:The measurements of the opacities at an instant T engine without load are alas well can be representative of the real pollution of a car all along the road ...
Exact a point measurement in opacity is not worth much ...but if you had deigned to open the docs above before opening something else, then you might have seen thisi:
l
Back to "Water injection in the engines: the assembly and experimentation"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 184 guests