I expose your opinion to your own idea (not if someone has already exposed something similar):
What do the specialists in steam generation think in a concentric chamber outside the exhaust tube, which would contain inside the reactor?
I believe that a very compact, suitable model can succeed to be installed in trucks, tractors and where there was not too much place for installation.
I will attach an explanatory drawing to a letter.
please
PANTONE ARGENTINO WITH STEAM GENERATOR INCORPORATED
hello rodibruno,
I am not yet an expert but I would like to give you my opinion. If I understood everything correctly, the reactor must be in the exhaust gas, because otherwise the process may not work, in the sense that it is precisely the characteristic of energy recovery. By cons the vaporization system can be done wherever you want. But hey the best is to experiment, your idea may be good, but you will know that if you try.
if you run out of space, have you heard of the "direct reaction" GVI? if not, find out about it, it's very interesting. But with a truck you have to have room for all the pantone systems.
Good luck and I can't wait to see your explanatory drawings, because I'm not sure I understood your idea.
Have a good day
I am not yet an expert but I would like to give you my opinion. If I understood everything correctly, the reactor must be in the exhaust gas, because otherwise the process may not work, in the sense that it is precisely the characteristic of energy recovery. By cons the vaporization system can be done wherever you want. But hey the best is to experiment, your idea may be good, but you will know that if you try.
if you run out of space, have you heard of the "direct reaction" GVI? if not, find out about it, it's very interesting. But with a truck you have to have room for all the pantone systems.
Good luck and I can't wait to see your explanatory drawings, because I'm not sure I understood your idea.
Have a good day
0 x
A TEAM DRAWING WITH GV INCORPORATED
pombo508 wrote:hello rodibruno,
I am not yet an expert but I would like to give you my opinion. If I understood everything correctly, the reactor must be in the exhaust gas, because otherwise the process may not work, in the sense that it is precisely the characteristic of energy recovery. By cons the vaporization system can be done wherever you want. But hey the best is to experiment, your idea may be good, but you will know that if you try.
if you run out of space, have you heard of the "direct reaction" GVI? if not, find out about it, it's very interesting. But with a truck you have to have room for all the pantone systems.
Good luck and I can't wait to see your explanatory drawings, because I'm not sure I understood your idea.
Have a good day
Hi Pombo:
I attach this explanatory drawing to a letter, it is true that in a truck there is enough space for the entire pantone system, but I am trying to simplify the installation. if it is possible alone we would need this team and the water tank, I think it would be more compact than the separate GV and connected from the outside with rubber piping.
I placed an outlet to make a dam, parallel to the water inlet of the constant level tank, to avoid accidental flooding of the room if the float of the tank binds.
I await comments !!
Pombo: we are in the third world, at this moment my UP-LOAD is very low and I cannot mount the archives ...
I will try again later.
Greetings
Rhodes
https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... 7J4GNg.jpg
0 x
Some time ago I imagined this remote system.
Like you I have a lot cogitated on the Pantone and find the ideal model, but I think as long as one does not pass the realization that there are uncertainties.
See
https://www.econologie.com/forums/dopage-mot ... 83-30.html
Like you I have a lot cogitated on the Pantone and find the ideal model, but I think as long as one does not pass the realization that there are uncertainties.
See
https://www.econologie.com/forums/dopage-mot ... 83-30.html
0 x
A 18 years I knew the money, love, roses, and now that the year is gone, I know that you never know. Jean Gabin
Manix07 wrote:Image of the reactor
HELLO MANIX:
I interpret that: are you injecting gas from the leak inside the reactor?
I believe that at greater RPM there would be a greater puncture of the gases: a truth? would the placement of a butterfly not be suitable in the main duct to force from the pitch of gases mainly through the duct which contains the reactor?
regards
rodi
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 6 Replies
- 6443 views
-
Last message by bleusideral
View the latest post
29/04/18, 19:49A subject posted in the forum : Water injection in engines: montages and experiments
-
- 27 Replies
- 29676 views
-
Last message by chatelot16
View the latest post
31/07/16, 11:00A subject posted in the forum : Water injection in engines: montages and experiments
-
- 1 Replies
- 5583 views
-
Last message by Flytox
View the latest post
01/12/15, 22:07A subject posted in the forum : Water injection in engines: montages and experiments
-
- 41 Replies
- 53904 views
-
Last message by Flytox
View the latest post
28/02/14, 18:43A subject posted in the forum : Water injection in engines: montages and experiments
-
- 21 Replies
- 32581 views
-
Last message by dede2002
View the latest post
17/02/14, 21:05A subject posted in the forum : Water injection in engines: montages and experiments
Back to "Water injection in the engines: the assembly and experimentation"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 197 guests