AUDI 2.8 V6 water doping

Edits and changes to engines, experiences, findings and ideas.
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados

AUDI 2.8 V6 water doping




by gary » 08/06/08, 16:29

Hello, interested for quite some time by water doping but few tests performed on gasoline and more with injection!

I am a little lost!

In your opinion, would mounting be feasible on my AUDI 2.8l v6 injection engine?
Currently I run on superethanol e85 average consumption 13L / 100 KM :frown:
please
0 x
User avatar
camel1
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 322
Registration: 29/01/05, 00:29
Location: Loire
x 1
Contact :

Re: AUDI 2.8 V6 WATER DOPING




by camel1 » 08/06/08, 17:10

gary wrote:.
Currently I run on superethanol e85 average consumption 13L / 100 KM :frown:
please


Change the car! : Cheesy:

A + + +

Michel
0 x
We were on the brink, but we made a big step forward ...
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 08/06/08, 17:17

Thank you for the advice, but I just bought it in Germany and it is not even registered yet so I will wait a bit!
0 x
georges100
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 338
Registration: 25/05/08, 16:51
x 1




by georges100 » 08/06/08, 17:26

I rejoin camel : Cheesy: even if he gives very little news from his car : Cheesy:

this kind of car will sell off because they consume ....
and those who take advantage of the opportunity would be wrong to complain about consumption : Cheesy:
and I wonder if a high performance car is really essential to drive at maximum 130 ....
0 x
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 08/06/08, 18:07

Little question: some say that the reactor rod magnetizes! and others recommend using stainless steel!
Since stainless steel is not a ferrous metal, how could it magnetize?
thanks.
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 08/06/08, 18:47

Hello Gary
gary wrote:Little question: some say that the reactor rod magnetizes! and others recommend using stainless steel!
Since stainless steel is not a ferrous metal, how could it magnetize?
thanks.


On dit acier stainless, the main component is iron ...
If the magnetic properties change from one shade of stainless steel to another it is a story of chemical composition and especially of structure (Austenitic, Martensitic or Ferritic etc ...)

http://www.heth.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?page=c6_1

It would seem that the fact that the rod magnetizes or not, does not influence the gain in consumption with a Gillier Pantome. This does not preclude that one can obtain magnetism without involving steel. Moving electrical charges using an ionized gas (in a Gillier Pantome reactor for example) also creates magnetic fields.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champ_magn%C3%A9tique

A+
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 08/06/08, 19:09

Thank you for this information, so I will favor stainless steel!
0 x
User avatar
I Citro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5129
Registration: 08/03/06, 13:26
Location: Bordeaux
x 11




by I Citro » 08/06/08, 21:11

: Arrow: I ride in big sedans too : Cry: but I avoid the V engines because of excessive usage and maintenance costs (notably at Audi, I know, I had an A4).

To significantly reduce the cost of use, if you want to keep your car for a long time, the best current choice is to switch to dual fuel petrol / LPG or possibly petrol / CNG.

The Pantone reactor should preferably be located closest to the engine. In the case of longitudinal V6, the ideal would be to put 2 reactors, one per bank of cylinders. This therefore represents 2 times more work ... :frown:
Finally, on such sophisticated engines, the electronic management tries to "compensate" for the doping and its effects not programmed in the original mapping, this is likely to generate many side effects ... I am thinking among others of the input Lambda values catalyst (expensive part and not very durable at Audi). I consider that doping is to be avoided on catalyzed engines, unless one wishes to eliminate this crap catalyst ... :x
0 x
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 08/06/08, 23:08

Certe! the ideal on the v6 would be to cross a reactor in each collector, but g not want to pierce the original collectors (not easy to find others), however I make a line in stainless steel which involves the removal of the catamaran! (anyway with superethanol it is no longer very useful!) but the probes themselves (one in each collector) remain in place: yes, unfortunately, unfortunately!
0 x
User avatar
I Citro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5129
Registration: 08/03/06, 13:26
Location: Bordeaux
x 11




by I Citro » 08/06/08, 23:37

: Arrow: Sacred site!

Be brave. Have you not thought about LPG?

I know 6L V2.8s that work very well on LPG ...
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Water injection in the engines: the assembly and experimentation"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 150 guests