jeff2410 wrote:for the exhaust outlet I am trying to make me manufacture a collector stainless steel (or iron) 4 1 with 4 integrated reactors followed by their 4 GVI (or 1 GVI common?) .As my exhaust outlets are just below of my intake entries it will be the shortest way and I will have the max of heat.
In this regard a diesel 4 cylinders (106 1,5D) it seems to me that the cylinders are walking in pairs, and when cyl1 3 2 are échappemnt the cyl4et are admission.
Would not it judiscieux to the exits to the réacteurs1et3 admission2et4 and ditto for réacteurs2et4 outputs to adm1et3?
We have almost identical engines, with very little space under the hood. It's been years 2 soon as I reflect on a heat exchanger exhaust / intake instead collectors.
Initially I intended to use the bottom of the "box" as a bubbler, which took volume and required a bypass to avoid swallowing cold water at startup. The GV makes it possible to simplify the bazaar.
It is necessary to aim rightly, because it is heavy to dismount / remount when one is not contortionist of circus. With my big fingers I rattle firmly, sometimes I can not pass both the key and the fingers that hold it!
Put a reactor by air intake seems to me a good thing. the hot gases can be plated closer to each reactor instead of dispersing a portion in the exhaust tube. When you can put a PVC exhaust downpipe, performance has taken a serious bonus!
Using an exhaust outlet to warm the next intake is attractive (1-3-4-2) but it seriously complicates the assembly and extends the air circuits. Especially since the thermal inertia of metals, the heat of the exhaust does not communicate immediately inside the reactor.
In any case you're bubbling with ideas! Do not stop in this good way. Welcome to the community...