I leave this post of oblivion to give you some news, not famous ...
If necessary, I will open another post for clarity.
As I had explained, my retrokit mounted on a 2.5D sofim Trafic engine gave no results with the PVC bubbler recommended by hypnow, just like jime. However, my colleague has had excellent results with an ultrasonic fogger.
So I decided some time ago to copy this idea. I made the same bubbler as my colleague, except for a few details (so not the same ...):
-It has 2 air inlet pipes and I only one but bigger.
-It has a constant level system that does not work and therefore fills up with water with 33cl every 100kms. I have a water tank with a 12V pump + an overflow on the bubbler which returns to this tank; I operate this pump roughly every 1/4 hour for 10s (enough to reach the overflow).
At the same time as I installed the fogger, I finished my bi-fuel with recycled oil.
From the first days I noticed a consumption of water identical to that of my colleague.
As I was driving mainly in oil and because of the shape of my 2nd tank and its lack of gauge, it was difficult (but not impossible) for me to make consumption measurements. So I did not do it naively thinking that the reactor was working (well!) Since I was consuming water while before, niet.
And then I was a bit on break from all that.
Recently I decided to ride a little GO to have a clear heart.
Results:
Previously, at GO and without reactor, an average consumption of 10.9l / 100kms. Recorded over 1500kms and precisely.
Now and under the same conditions of use (mountain roads and a little road, no motorway, only the outside temperature has dropped), consumption of 11.96l / 100kms! Recorded on 120kms traveled (I know it's not much). Almost 10% more!
No need to explain my disillusionment to you.
I recontact my colleague today (it's a relationship via the internet, just to tell you that we don't communicate in all the details) and explain all that to him.
There he teaches me that his system is improved by a VSLA and a flange at the air filter outlet to force passage through the reactor.
From the air it passes through mine.
The reactor outlet hose is hot.
Water, I consume it. (I also believe that our identical water consumption is due to the fact that we have the same fogger).
But a WITH, I don't have one!
And by re-reading this post and others, I come back to this:
Andre wrote:In water doping there are 3 parts to consider
What enters the reactor (the most important) the way in that enters the intake manifold and the reactor (the least important)
The way to enter the intake manifold ... it made TILT!
It is ultimately the only thing that differs between our 2 assemblies (+ the flange on air hose).
So do you think the solution may be there?
In this case would you have a simple WITH to advise me?
Thank you in advance for your help and have a good evening (or good day for André).
Fred