Gildas wrote:Indeed, the gasoline evaporates first for start-up as Mr Donzeau says, but subsequently the water is broken down into HHO by the reactor "It is rocket fuel" he says, which would explain the saving of more than 50% of gasoline.
Besides, this reaction could not occur if the reactor is not under vacuum, for example: if the exhaust gas valve is too open (?).
There are a whole bunch of theories to "explain" the phenomenon, from the best substantiated to the most wacky. AMHA water is not a fuel, it improves we do not really know what precisely in the cycle which reduces consumption and pollution but does not provide energy, and 50% savings are good for journalists.Do not understand that Christophe had only 5% fuel savings with his generator!
We must not compare a documented scientific investigation work, limited in time and means, with accounts to be rendered (examination) with the patient developed over years by enthusiasts who allow themselves to experiment in all directions without having to explain or be accountable. Scientific rigor "against" empiricism, eventually the second solution will not be able to do much better, when we have studied / understood what is needed.The assembly of the mower of Mr. Donzeau also uses iron, or this metal is capable of decomposing water to 100 Degree (Bottom of page) which can increase the perfs.
There is another post that talks about this, if I remember correctly, in theory the phenomenon does exist, but the amount of gas produced is ridiculously low compared to the needs of an engine. After, in the real conditions of the reactor or Gillier Pantone, is there a significant increase in gas production efficiency, between temperature, depression, electrification of water droplets etc ... ??? Nothing demonstrated!I can't wait to make a Pantone to check it all out!
Come on let's get started! Is the vehicle?