Thanks for taking a look, I'm a little tired of wasting time with this character ...Christophe wrote:Uh there are lots of bp links that have nothing to do directly with organic ... [...]

Woodcutter wrote:But there, there would be such a difference in favor of organic farming that this type of study cannot be included in the 20 p.m. newspaper ...
As the late Coluche said: "You can't tell the truth on TV: too many people are watching it"
Woodcutter wrote:Thanks for taking a look, I'm a little tired of wasting time with this character ...Christophe wrote:Uh there are lots of bp links that have nothing to do directly with organic ... [...]
pb2487 wrote:Woodcutter wrote:But there, there would be such a difference in favor of organic farming that this type of study cannot be included in the 20 p.m. newspaper ...
As the late Coluche said: "You can't tell the truth on TV: too many people are watching it"
Excuse me for the interpretation, I thought it was more than largely implied in what you said. No?
The media are largely in favor of "organic" and why not after all.
It took me 5 min to check it out. I can go further in the analysis if you want.
I do not know anyone who is insensitive and uninformed of the damage of conventional and the benefits of organic.
Even the government publishes polls (see post Gébé) which proves it, unless it shoots itself in the foot.
There is no need, in my opinion, for an outcry or fuss over an article that would be "supposedly" against organic or else it is disinformation.
Why should I think otherwise?
If you classify me your links and you find some which, in a prime-time TV newspaper, clearly says, scientific studies in support, the harmful effects of conventional agriculture compared to organic in one of the fields that I quoted (see above), then yes I would go to see ...pb2487 wrote:[...] You are right do not waste time to verify what I say, it is surely false.
Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 71 guests