Worcester wheel
- highfly-addict
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 757
- Registration: 05/03/08, 12:07
- Location: Pyrenees, 43 years
- x 7
+1 Hydraxon
Being a Nobel Prize winner does not prevent you from talking nonsense ....
To meditate too.
Tagor wrote:
maybe we could meditate on this sentence
Nobel Prize winner Werner Heisenberg
Being a Nobel Prize winner does not prevent you from talking nonsense ....
To meditate too.
0 x
"God laughs at those who deplore the effects of which they cherish the causes" BOSSUET
"We see what we believes"Dennis MEADOWS
"We see what we believes"Dennis MEADOWS
- highfly-addict
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 757
- Registration: 05/03/08, 12:07
- Location: Pyrenees, 43 years
- x 7
To talk nonsense, sometimes.
But to be seen abusively attributing sentences as a bad argument of authority, or getting out of their context in a way that shows that we have understood nothing in the original sense, much more often!
The worst being Einstein, of course: any sentence on science whose author has been forgotten is attributed to Einstein.
But to be seen abusively attributing sentences as a bad argument of authority, or getting out of their context in a way that shows that we have understood nothing in the original sense, much more often!
The worst being Einstein, of course: any sentence on science whose author has been forgotten is attributed to Einstein.
0 x
-
- I discovered econologic
- posts: 1
- Registration: 02/02/10, 17:32
simple system to test for harry
I read this queue with great interest.
Harry's prototype is far too complicated to make.
It would be easier to build something very simple and "out of line" to show that the system cannot work, despite appearances:
Take a wheel with 4 spokes, at the end of each spoke is fixed a hammer or more exactly a mass. This mass is articulated and fixed to the spoke with a system of pawls which means that the mass can only rotate in one direction. Each mass is thus found in an identical position when the wheel turns.Each mass is inclined and causes the wheel to turn clockwise. On the right side, the mass is further from the axis of rotation than on the right side.
So, will it turn or not turn ???
Harry's prototype is far too complicated to make.
It would be easier to build something very simple and "out of line" to show that the system cannot work, despite appearances:
Take a wheel with 4 spokes, at the end of each spoke is fixed a hammer or more exactly a mass. This mass is articulated and fixed to the spoke with a system of pawls which means that the mass can only rotate in one direction. Each mass is thus found in an identical position when the wheel turns.Each mass is inclined and causes the wheel to turn clockwise. On the right side, the mass is further from the axis of rotation than on the right side.
So, will it turn or not turn ???
0 x
Will not turn!
No desire at all to explain why and to get bogged down in an endless debate!
Those who believe that it will turn out have only to make a prototype if they have time to lose!
I try everything and to no avail!
No desire at all to explain why and to get bogged down in an endless debate!
Those who believe that it will turn out have only to make a prototype if they have time to lose!
I try everything and to no avail!
0 x
Stepping behind sometimes can strengthen friendship.
Criticism is good if added to some compliments.
Alain
Criticism is good if added to some compliments.
Alain
-
- I understand econologic
- posts: 183
- Registration: 18/03/08, 14:30
Hello everybody
I quote Capt_Maloche:
Maybe I'm wrong, but a sum of negative force means that there is a force in the opposite direction, right?
Could you mean negative energy, which means that if we put the wheel in motion, it will lose energy until it returns to its original position, stops it.
But if you use the word force well, I think then that the wheel turns but in the opposite direction.
Please note, I am not saying anything, I just want to have an explanation of what you have indicated.
I would like to create a prototype, just to see what it will give ... but given the precision that must be had, I do not have the budget for that.
I quote Capt_Maloche:
you can see for yourself that the sum of the forces is zero, and that in motion, it is downright negative.
Maybe I'm wrong, but a sum of negative force means that there is a force in the opposite direction, right?
Could you mean negative energy, which means that if we put the wheel in motion, it will lose energy until it returns to its original position, stops it.
But if you use the word force well, I think then that the wheel turns but in the opposite direction.
Please note, I am not saying anything, I just want to have an explanation of what you have indicated.
I would like to create a prototype, just to see what it will give ... but given the precision that must be had, I do not have the budget for that.
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 8 Replies
- 19790 views
-
Last message by jean1789
View the latest post
12/11/13, 19:20A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
Go back to "Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 137 guests