Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)

Innovations, ideas or patents for sustainable development. Decrease in energy consumption, reduction of pollution, improvement of yields or processes ... Myths or reality about inventions of the past or the future: the inventions of Tesla, Newman, Perendev, Galey, Bearden, cold fusion ...
petitbreton
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 18
Registration: 14/12/21, 10:02
x 4

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by petitbreton » 08/01/22, 18:16

humus wrote:
Petitbreton wrote:Uh; are you a politician ??? No, because I can only see the answer to my questioning from a great distance !!!

Why, should I?

What is it that you don't understand in my answer?
What is your clear question? I didn't write down a question mark.

The only question I saw and answered: yes we can convert from active to reactive and vice versa.
Your PC's switching power supply does just that all day.


If I understand correctly you are therefore a Christophe Tétard bis !! So there, it's true, I can't do anything anymore !!
0 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by humus » 08/01/22, 18:54

Petitbreton wrote:If I understand correctly you are therefore a Christophe Tétard bis !! So there, it's true, I can't do anything anymore !!

It's not a terrible argument : Lol:
What do you question in my words and above all, why?
Explain.
0 x
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6980
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2905

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by gegyx » 08/01/22, 19:00

Breton fart is swollen!
He comes to revive us with his tadpole stories, and he becomes insulting.

Go ask him questions to the inventor of the tales in question / big jealous

**
It smacks of the general attack by the 5th column!
1 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by humus » 08/01/22, 19:09

gegyx wrote:It smacks of the general attack by the 5th column!

I don't think so, since, rightly, he breaks it at the start.
Or they are very bad.
0 x
petitbreton
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 18
Registration: 14/12/21, 10:02
x 4

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by petitbreton » 08/01/22, 19:50

humus wrote:
Petitbreton wrote:If I understand correctly you are therefore a Christophe Tétard bis !! So there, it's true, I can't do anything anymore !!

It's not a terrible argument : Lol:
What do you question in my words and above all, why?
Explain.

It's true, it's not a terrible argument! You simply did not understand that it is not and that it is in fact a simple observation!
0 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by humus » 08/01/22, 19:59

Petitbreton wrote:It's true, it's not a terrible argument! You simply did not understand that it is not and that it is in fact a simple observation!

Where do you plan to go like that?
Do you think you're pissing me off? : Lol:
I just notice that you are not picking up anything or going wrong or are not on level.
It's fashion right now : roll:
Come back when you want 8) .
0 x
petitbreton
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 18
Registration: 14/12/21, 10:02
x 4

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by petitbreton » 08/01/22, 20:06

humus wrote:
Petitbreton wrote:It's true, it's not a terrible argument! You simply did not understand that it is not and that it is in fact a simple observation!

Where do you plan to go like that?
Do you think you're pissing me off? : Lol:
I just notice that you are not picking up anything or going wrong or are not on level.
It's fashion right now : roll:
Come back when you want 8) .

Same behavior as this "brave" Christophe!
Me in this case, as I can not fight against the pseudo geniuses, well I apply the second principle of Audiard!
0 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by humus » 08/01/22, 20:17

Petitbreton wrote:
humus wrote:
Petitbreton wrote:It's true, it's not a terrible argument! You simply did not understand that it is not and that it is in fact a simple observation!

Where do you plan to go like that?
Do you think you're pissing me off? : Lol:
I just notice that you are not picking up anything or going wrong or are not on level.
It's fashion right now : roll:
Come back when you want 8) .

Same behavior as this "brave" Christophe!
Me in this case, as I can not fight against the pseudo geniuses, well I apply the second principle of Audiard!

Such a simplistic personal attack has no hold on me, you are wasting your time.
you are still empty of arguments compared to the arguments that I provided to you, me. : Mrgreen:
Attitude which brings you closer to what you reproach your "brave" Christophe.
A concern for personal consistency to be addressed?
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by Exnihiloest » 08/01/22, 22:28

Petitbreton wrote:Well, here it has just been released !!!!! If anyone understands well let him know:


I have followed the Kapanadze affair from the start (it's been quite a few years already). No one has managed to duplicate anything from their system (I even wonder how their patents were accepted, there are undescribed black boxes everywhere). I even had fun duplicating the "Kapagen", which was a version revisited by JL Naudin. Not the slightest effect could suggest a departure from conventional physics.
But for years incompetent people have been talking about it and claiming to explain its principles and secrets to you as if they were specialists in a technology that works (Wesley on overunity.com) and some produce pseudo-replications by promoting on youtube (Akula).
Of course, no serious experimentalist, amateur or professional electronics engineer or engineer will ever confirm their assemblies by producing a well reproducible engineering diagram.
These charlatans then acquire notoriety, sell books, or are paid for presentations at conferences on "free energy". As for the pseudo-inventors, they solicit investors and even make them pay for the visit of their machine. This "free energy" movement started on the Internet in the 1990s, and has never produced anything real since.
Scientifically, Kapanadze, it absolutely does not hold water. There isn't even the slightest original idea that could make us think that Maxwell's electromagnetism could be faulted. Everything is hyper-conventional, only the claim of obtaining free energy is not, but unfortunately, there is not the slightest fact to support these ramblings.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)




by Obamot » 08/01/22, 23:18

Exnihiloest wrote:
Petitbreton wrote:Well, here it has just been released !!!!! If anyone understands well let him know:


I have followed the Kapanadze affair from the start (it's been quite a few years already). No one has managed to duplicate anything from their system (I even wonder how their patents were accepted, there are undescribed black boxes everywhere). I even had fun duplicating the "Kapagen", which was a version revisited by JL Naudin. Not the slightest effect could suggest a departure from conventional physics.
But for years incompetent people have been talking about it and claiming to explain its principles and secrets to you as if they were specialists in a technology that works (Wesley on overunity.com) and some produce pseudo-replications by promoting on youtube (Akula).
Of course, no serious experimentalist, amateur or professional electronics engineer or engineer will ever confirm their assemblies by producing a well reproducible engineering diagram.
These charlatans then acquire notoriety, sell books, or are paid for presentations at conferences on "free energy". As for the pseudo-inventors, they solicit investors and even make them pay for the visit of their machine. This "free energy" movement started on the Internet in the 1990s, and has never produced anything real since.
Scientifically, Kapanadze, it absolutely does not hold water. There isn't even the slightest original idea that could make us think that Maxwell's electromagnetism could be faulted. Everything is hyper-conventional, only the claim of obtaining free energy is not, but unfortunately, there is not the slightest fact to support these ramblings.
There is not the slightest scientific argument in this "pavement" : Mrgreen:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 132 guests