I don't know much about quantum, but I remember putting this video and others of the synchrotron Soleil at the start of our reunion in 2014eclectron wrote:ABC2019 wrote:
and for the record, the electrons do not “collide”, nor do they “revolve around the nuclei”, these are classic images, but the quantum description is more complicated. But I'm not going to give you a quantum mechanics class, I think it would be a waste of time.
Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 13691
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1515
- Contact :
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
0 x
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
Ah bah excuse me I did not know that we had the Daniel Barenboim of physics on this forum. And I'm the one who has the oversized ego, the one who asks you questions that you never really answer.
I feel like I'm going to drop the smug tone and switch to the insulting tone because your answers are an insult to intelligence, not just mine, everyone's.
YOU DO NOT HEAR ANYTHING from what the other is saying and I really wonder if you understand what you are saying.
In summary it gives: A single average temperature and a probability distribution.
Do you understand what that means probability distribution?
It means several values but instantaneously, following the others, very very quickly, not on average ....................... And you don't remember that there is only one temperature therefore I am?
I will whistle the end of the game, I withdraw!
Well still wasted too much time with human bullshit. You don't amuse me anymore
PS; what I let piss yesterday
reread the thermal noise in a resistor, it is written in black on white P=
I discovered something that I didn't know and that every good scientist already knows. So I am absolutely not claiming to have invented anything. It's still you who projects your fantasies on me.
As for the mastery I have no lesson to receive from you on this specific case in any case, you have been missing the point for centuries because you are deaf or blind!
I feel like I'm going to drop the smug tone and switch to the insulting tone because your answers are an insult to intelligence, not just mine, everyone's.
YOU DO NOT HEAR ANYTHING from what the other is saying and I really wonder if you understand what you are saying.
ABC2019 wrote:I sent you a link on what is called a statistical set, which explains that a system in contact with a thermal reservoir will be put at ONE temperature (that of the reservoir) but that it can occupy SEVERAL energy levels , with a probability distribution given by the Boltzmann statistic: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ensemble_canonique
In summary it gives: A single average temperature and a probability distribution.
Do you understand what that means probability distribution?
It means several values but instantaneously, following the others, very very quickly, not on average ....................... And you don't remember that there is only one temperature therefore I am?
I will whistle the end of the game, I withdraw!
Well still wasted too much time with human bullshit. You don't amuse me anymore
PS; what I let piss yesterday
ABC2019 wrote:and that would be explained on good links that would tell you what work we can extract from it, if it wasn't bad, don't you think?
reread the thermal noise in a resistor, it is written in black on white P=
So yes I discovered something that I find great. I discovered it for myself and not for science.ABC2019 wrote:Do you think that you are the only one who understood a great thing in a theory that you obviously do not understand?
I discovered something that I didn't know and that every good scientist already knows. So I am absolutely not claiming to have invented anything. It's still you who projects your fantasies on me.
As for the mastery I have no lesson to receive from you on this specific case in any case, you have been missing the point for centuries because you are deaf or blind!
Frankly you don't do them honorABC2019 wrote:the ABCdesque universe is that of physicists
But life is a fairy tale, just take off your darkening glassesABC2019 wrote: and the eclectronesque universe is that of fairy tales.
0 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
We will try the 3 posts per day max
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
eclectron wrote:Ah bah excuse me I did not know that we had the Daniel Barenboim of physics on this forum.
I took a name that you and I knew, but there are loads of musicians far more competent than you I guess, and you wouldn't think of giving them physics lessons
And I'm the one who has the oversized ego, the one who asks you questions that you never really answer.
I don't know what you need, I spend hours answering you, more than any other member of the forum.
And yes, you refuse to acknowledge your shortcomings, therefore you have an oversized ego. I don't spend my time posting on subjects I don't know well by treating others as idiots, so I don't accept your comparison.
I feel like I'm going to drop the smug tone and switch to the insulting tone because your answers are an insult to intelligence, not just mine, everyone's.
YOU DO NOT HEAR ANYTHING from what the other is saying and I really wonder if you understand what you are saying.
cf answers above, it is not because you refuse to listen to my answers that it gives you the right to say that I do not understand what I say.
ABC2019 wrote:I sent you a link on what is called a statistical set, which explains that a system in contact with a thermal reservoir will be put at ONE temperature (that of the reservoir) but that it can occupy SEVERAL energy levels , with a probability distribution given by the Boltzmann statistic: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ensemble_canonique
In summary it gives: A single average temperature and a probability distribution.
Do you understand what that means probability distribution?
It means several values but instantaneously, following the others, very very quickly, not on average ....................... And you don't remember that there is only one temperature therefore I am?
there is several energy values et only one value temperature, which is a parameter of the probability distribution of energies.
If you can't figure that out, just admit it's beyond your competence and stop posting about it, okay?
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
ABC2019 wrote:there is several energy values et only one value AVERAGE temperature, which is a parameter of the probability distribution of energies. and therefore a distribution of temperatures centered on the mean value, in the infinitely small (time and space)
If you can't figure that out, just admit it's beyond your competence and stop posting about it, okay?
And I have an oversized ego because I don't accept human bullshit?
Possible...
0 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
We will try the 3 posts per day max
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
on the other hand, if we could exploit the digital wind blowing on Econology, that would be a sacred source of energy.
1 x
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
Remundo wrote:on the other hand, if we could exploit the digital wind blowing on Econology, that would be a sacred source of energy.
Don't tell me that as a mod you have to read everything?
All this talk is summed up in the correction in red at ABC.
0 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
We will try the 3 posts per day max
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
theoretically, yes we must read everything
after there is theory and practice ...
good to go, we calm down a bit, we relax.
after there is theory and practice ...
good to go, we calm down a bit, we relax.
0 x
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
Remundo wrote:
good to go, we calm down a bit, we relax.
You're right, it's nice outside
1 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
We will try the 3 posts per day max
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
eclectron wrote:there is several energy values et only one value AVERAGE of the temperature,
What you write is wrong. Temperature is a parameter of the probability distribution, it is NOT an average value. The definition of an average value is precise ( = ∫rho (E) g (E) A (E) dE / ∫rho (E) g (E) dE, read a phy stat course to understand), and the temperature is not part of it, because this definition only makes sense for a quantity A (E) which depends on the microscopic state of the system, which is not the case for temperature.
On the other hand there is an average temperature Space, for systems with local thermal equilibrium whose temperature varies spatially, but the temperature is still well defined at each point, it is not a local "average" (and if the temperature varies from one point to one other, one is not with the global thermal equilibrium).
You are just writing the wrong things that are because you are not knowledgeable enough in these matters to say the right things.
, which is a parameter of the probability distribution of energies. and therefore a distribution of temperatures centered on the mean value, in the infinitely small (time and space)
If you can't figure that out, just admit it's beyond your competence and stop posting about it, okay?
I can't figure it out for the good reason that it doesn't make sense, and stop pretending that you know more about it than I do, when it's obvious you don't. You locked yourself in an attitude that you can't get out of.
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Re: Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)
ABC2019 wrote:eclectron wrote:there is several energy values et only one value AVERAGE of the temperature,
What you write is wrong. Temperature is a parameter of the probability distribution, it is NOT an average value. The definition of an average value is precise ( = ∫rho (E) g (E) A (E) dE / ∫rho (E) g (E) dE, read a phy stat course to understand), and the temperature is not part of it, because this definition only makes sense for a quantity A (E) which depends on the microscopic state of the system, which is not the case for temperature.
On the other hand there is an average temperature Space, for systems with local thermal equilibrium whose temperature varies spatially, but the temperature is still well defined at each point, it is not a local "average" (and if the temperature varies from one point to one other, one is not with the global thermal equilibrium).
You are just writing the wrong things that are because you are not knowledgeable enough in these matters to say the right things., which is a parameter of the probability distribution of energies. and therefore a distribution of temperatures centered on the mean value, in the infinitely small (time and space)
If you can't figure that out, just admit it's beyond your competence and stop posting about it, okay?
I can't figure it out for the good reason that it doesn't make sense, and stop pretending that you know more about it than I do, when it's obvious you don't. You locked yourself in an attitude that you can't get out of.
Maybe I don't speak the purist physicist well but I understand physics and even quantum, in part
So make an effort to understand what I'm saying in French and translate it into "physicist" if you like.
Only you can pretend that I know the thermo better than you. I never said it but obviously I still understand better what is happening in the matter
And I feel all the stronger on this point as there is a host of physicists who ARE PRODUCING RESULTS, THEM, working on the subject of thermal energy collection / thermal agitation.
I could give you links but you don't deserve
0 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
We will try the 3 posts per day max
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 3 Replies
- 4113 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
23/12/20, 09:44A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
-
- 652 Replies
- 49581 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
30/03/21, 17:23A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
-
- 98 Replies
- 15569 views
-
Last message by sicetaitsimple
View the latest post
29/10/20, 17:43A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
-
- 7 Replies
- 6027 views
-
Last message by Exnihiloest
View the latest post
11/11/18, 19:00A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
-
- 4 Replies
- 5025 views
-
Last message by Exnihiloest
View the latest post
14/07/21, 17:28A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
Go back to "Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : Majestic-12 [Bot] and 89 guests