quartz wrote:
But as Mr. Audiard would say, "as soon as we no longer address the primary, everything becomes bright"
Thank you gentlemen.
Hi quartz, hi Capt_Maloche. I will try to stay above "the primaries"
I watched your videos on the "magnetic motor".
I'm telling you right away, I don't think it's an engine.
This is however very interesting because I think you invented, perhaps with Capt_Maloche a gear without mechanical contact.
My observations:
- your machine does not rotate if you do not operate one of the discs by hand.
- your machine presents positions of equilibrium characteristic of a conservative force field: each time a position corresponds to a trough of potential energy, the system "falls into it" naturally, and vice versa, each time it is a bump, it rocks.
I noticed that when you turn slowly, it seems that the ratio between the rotation speeds is constant. Hence this perception of magnetic gear that I had.
You also sometimes have a "reversibility problem": it's when you want to spin the other record very quickly with the one spinning slowly. This is normal because the slightest friction can exceed the transmitted torque which is low in this direction, while it is large in the other and "swallows" the friction without problem.
When you turn the entrance very quickly, "it gets out of phase", but
it could still work in asynchronous transmission: mechanical contactless coupling between a rotary input and a rotary output of slightly lower speed. A bit like in an asynchronous motor where the exciter field is rotated faster than the rotor.
Like I said, I believe you have found a principle although you are looking for something else
that of magnetic transmissions with permanent magnets.
Here is my opinion, perhaps hasty, it engages only me ...
Good luck to both of you and to @ +