Remundo wrote:thank you for confusing. What are you wearing your nickname ...
Eric Dupont is not a speculator spot market. Eric Dupont is in a logic of connection and contract. For a small installation, it comes under Enedis, and for a large one, RTE.
Enedis and RTE are only underlings of the EDF-State monopoly which have regulatory power on the subject.
Not exactly, I filed a patent for a machine that improves energy storage efficiency with liquid nitrogen, patent that I filed in Europe, India in China in the United States, Canada, Australia, Morocco and I am also the president of the company NTERK which made a demonstrator which concerns this machine, and I look at what will be able to be the market for the machine of NTERK with the licenses of the patent which I will grant, therefore we are in the international. My con-curent is highpower technology in england which also stores energy with liquid nitrogen with a slightly different process since it is also obliged to store heat. At the moment higwview power is building a 250 kWh cryogenic storage system in england and has contracts with chile the united states i believe.
meanwhile in france the state "thinks" and says in its roadmap that there is no real need for a storage system before 2035 and that the best candidate would be hydrogen. We know that the French state, EDF, if it turns out that an efficient and profitable energy storage system existed, it would be obliged to accelerate the shutdown of nuclear power plants as it has committed to. Reason why we can see that the entire nuclear industry is killing itself has repeated that we do not know how to store energy, that nuclear is controllable that renewable energies are not, that if we stop the nuclear we will have to build gas power stations and pollute more.
So to come back to NTERK I can see that on the spot market, the price of energy goes from simple to triple depending on the time of day, during the 2 peak hours it is three times more expensive. I also see that with regard to photovoltaics, the price of energy for ground-based power plants will and could quickly reach 30 euros per MWH if their constructions were not limited to calls for tenders. and it turns out that my system would allow the installers of these power stations to inject their production into the network not when the sun is shining but when the french people need it, at peak times and when the renewable energy conditions are not good. that is to say that instead of selling the energy 20 or 30 euros per MWH, which does not allow them to make profitable their installations, he could sell it 60 or 70 euros and would therefore not need the subsidies which are limited in quantity.
The above Remundo, explains that the state, with EDF RTE will not let it happen, according to him, because if in France we produced energy with renewable energy, there would be no need for nuclear anymore and we would end up dismantling nuclear power plants and managing waste with money that has not been adequately supplied. on which I retort, it does not matter, in Spain, in Germany in Italy, in Switzerland that will not pose a problem because these countries understood that the nuclear was not the solution. and that with an adequate storage system they will no longer need to import nuclear energy from France when their renewables are lacking. and therefore ultimately the interest in France is that this solution develops.
For NTERK, if there is a market, it means the possibility of developing and reaching its goal more quickly, reducing global warming, finding industrial partners who invest in the project, participate and develop.