Tesla energy sensor

[dedeleco]

Without certain geniuses, Einstein, Tesla, etc., Science and technology would have advanced with a slight delay, because, the first, they only materialize many other works of essential ants too.

So without Tesla we would have our technology.

I am not convinced that all his inventions are real !!

[moinsdewatt]

.....
Pcq, we know that many great patents have been crammed in the drawers of multinationals for decades.
...

Patents are not piled up in the drawers of multinationals.

They can be read at the patent office in each country. In the old days you had to go read the paper at the patent office. Now with the Internet you can read patents from your computer.

and after 20 years their use falls into the public domain.

So there are no great patents before 1991 that you can't do anything about.

So stop psychotizing with N. Tesla's patents

[dedeleco]

So stop psychotizing with N. Tesla's patents

but if, we did not understand anything about its incomplete patents hiding the essential !!
We are not all great enough !!

[moinsdewatt]

So stop psychotizing with N. Tesla's patents

but if, we did not understand anything about its incomplete patents hiding the essential !!
We are not all great enough !!

Ah well. As far as I know there is no N Tesla patent that is the subject of a competition on the Internet to decipher its hidden meaning.

[the middle]

Patents are not piled up in the drawers of multinationals.

They can be read at the patent office in each country. In the old days you had to go read the paper at the patent office. Now with the Internet you can read patents from your computer.

Am I stupid, I hadn't thought of it!
But then, why are there so many industrial spy stories
And following this reasoning, the detailed plans of the atomic bomb should also be on the net!

[Christophe]

And following this reasoning, the detailed plans of the atomic bomb should also be on the net!

Well in my opinion they can be found by searching well in certain circles of the net (internet is not necessarily on the web http) ... the problem (and fortunately) is to obtain the fissile material of military quality .. .and probably some other materials ...

[the middle]

And following this reasoning, the detailed plans of the atomic bomb should also be on the net!

Well in my opinion they can be found by searching well in certain circles of the net (internet is not necessarily on the web http) ... the problem (and fortunately) is to obtain the fissile material of military quality .. .and probably some other materials ...

No no.
There has been proof, by the American secret services, that (I don't have the details any more in mind), Pakistan sold cried and stuff to I do not know which Arab country.

[the middle]

Here, I found the details.

Now he has just admitted his fault. And beg forgiveness for delivering the secrets of nuclear technology to North Korea, Iran and Libya. A curious scene hides in fact behind these public confessions, made on national television. One way to whitewash the Pakistani army. Which knew, of course, through its all-powerful secret services, Isi (Inter-Services Intelligence).

http://www.lepoint.fr/actualites-monde/ ... 24/0/43625

[Christophe]

Moué but it was in which year ct affair because ... found this in 2 seconds on google:

The USA published the plans of the atomic bomb on the Internet

20th June 2008



The United States, which claims to want to ensure global security and in the name of this objective assume the right to attack Iran, presents the spread of nuclear technology as a major, unacceptable risk. This is a serious argument, which seems to deserve consideration. Except that in 2006, in its frenzy to retrospectively prove the merits of its invasion of Iraq, the White House published on the net the recipe for the bomb on a site making the archives seized after the war available to the public. Much to the dismay of the IAEA.


By William J. Broad, New York Times, November 3, 2006 - excerpts

In March 2006, the US government created a website to publicize the many archives of Iraqi documents seized during the war. The Bush administration made this decision under pressure from elected Republican congressmen who hoped to take advantage of the Internet "to find new evidence of the dangers posed by Saddam Hussein before the outbreak of war."

But in recent weeks, the "Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal" has published information that weapons experts believe is dangerous. These are detailed accounts of Iraq's secret nuclear research programs, dating back to before the first Gulf War in 1991. Experts say these documents provide a basic guide to making an atomic bomb.

The government shut down the site last night after the New York Times reported protests from weapons systems specialists and international arms control officials. A spokesperson for the director of intelligence services announced that access to the site had been suspended "pending a review to ensure that its content is suitable for public release." "

Officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency, fearing that this information could facilitate the development of nuclear weapons for states like Iran, last week made an informal protest to the American delegate to the IAEA, say European diplomats who have chosen to remain anonymous. A diplomat says the agency's technical experts "were shocked" by the disclosure.

The documents complained of, about a dozen in number, are diagrams, diagrams, mathematical formulas as well as long explanatory texts on the making of nuclear bombs. Experts who have consulted them believe that this information goes beyond what is available on the Internet or in other websites. forums public. These documents provide detailed information on the manufacturing process of nuclear firing and explosive detonation circuits, as well as on the radioactive cores of atomic bombs.

"For the United States, it is very irresponsible to strike a match on such flammable terrain", judge Bryan A. Siebert, former head of document classification at the Department of Energy, in charge of nuclear weapons programs . "There are a lot of things about nuclear weapons that are and should be kept secret. "

The government had already received warnings about the content of this website. Last spring, after the site published Iraqi documents dealing with chemical weapons, United Nations arms control officials obtained the removal of a page that provided information on the production of tabun and sarin, deadly neurotoxicants that cause respiratory failure.

European diplomats said this week that some of the documents made available on this site are identical to those presented to the UN Security Council in late 2002, as the US prepared to invade Iraq. But unlike the version published on the Internet, the documents transmitted to the Security Council had been widely censored, in order to conceal sensitive information on unconventional weapons.

This redaction, according to diplomats, had been carried out in agreement with American officials and those of nations mastering nuclear technology. Mohammed El Baradei, the director of the International Energy Agency, who was responsible for part of the inspections in Iraq, told the Security Council in late 2002 that these precautions were "consistent with the rule that sensitive information should not be made public. "

A high-ranking European diplomat notes that experts have studied these nuclear documents published on this site and considered their publication potentially dangerous. "It's a cookbook," says the diplomat, who speaks anonymously because of his duty of care. "If you have that, it speeds up a lot of things. "

The New York Times has examined dozens of these documents and has asked several nuclear experts to assess some of them.

Peter D. Zimmerman, a physicist who worked for the state, called them "very sensitive, much of which is undoubtedly classified data. "


-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

http://contreinfo.info/article.php3?id_article=2083

[the middle]

serious!