Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet

[Christophe]

Here is Rémi Guillet's latest book on wet combustion, published by Cambridge editions please!

In .pdf

1-5275-3902-4-overprint-prontaprint.pdf

(1.11 million) Downloaded times 368

Combustion_humide.jpg (112.81 KiB) Viewed 4162 times

resumé.gif (72.48 KiB) Viewed 4162 times

[GuyGadebois]

Izy is going to pretend this is rubbish again with a well-felt "but of course".

[Exnihiloest]

I do not know if this Rémi Guillet has good ideas, but he has no echo in technical or scientific circles, apart from the publishers.
Has he produced a proof of concept?

[Janic]

Izy is going to pretend this is rubbish again with a well-felt "but of course".

Lost! his enemy brother (for those who remember this couple of actors) who stuck to it. It is not better, but in the absence of blackbird we are content with thrush until the specialist in everything on everything starts.

[Exnihiloest]

Izy is going to pretend this is rubbish again with a well-felt "but of course".

Lost! his enemy brother (for those who remember this couple of actors) who stuck to it. It is not better, but in the absence of blackbird we are content with thrush until the specialist in everything on everything starts.

Still waiting for the effects of the candle that you put in Saint-Antoine to regain your senses?

[Christophe]

I do not know if this Rémi Guillet has good ideas, but he has no echo in technical or scientific circles, apart from the publishers.
Has he produced a proof of concept?

No echo? Among YOUR technical circles and YOUR scientific circles perhaps? Apparently there are backgrounds more ignorant than others ... It is true that we still teach future heating engineers that a good oil flame is a yellow flame ... while we have known how to make blue oil flame for 15-20 years, bullshit and ignorance it can be treated but you have to want it!

If you had read earlier in this topic you would have found the following info, it's just on the previous page: understanding water-injection / combustion-wet-explanations-by-remi-guillet-t5794-40.html

a) A publication in engineering techniques (where econologie.com is cited as a reference ...): https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/bas ... 10005.html

b) Its work is at the base of the PAVE boiler (water vapor pump): inventions, innovations / boiler-CSTC-pave-pump-a-steam-and-water-t14245.html

Sorry but here, we are much further than the simple proof of concept... even the Chinese use it: https://www.econologie.com/combustion-h ... -nox-smog/

But you, behind your keyboard, YOU know ... oh poor you!

[GuyGadebois]

But you, behind your keyboard, YOU know ... oh poor you!

Relying on his outdated studies, the fatuity of this branque is limitless.

[Exnihiloest]

But you, behind your keyboard, YOU know ... oh poor you!

Relying on his outdated studies, the fatuity of this branque is limitless.

Still nervous pees? You have to consult.

[Exnihiloest]

I do not know if this Rémi Guillet has good ideas, but he has no echo in technical or scientific circles, apart from the publishers.
Has he produced a proof of concept?

No echo? Among YOUR technical circles and YOUR scientific circles perhaps? Apparently there are backgrounds more ignorant than others ... It is true that we still teach future heating engineers that a good oil flame is a yellow flame ... while we have known how to make blue oil flame for 15-20 years, bullshit and ignorance it can be treated but you have to want it!

If you had read earlier in this topic you would have found the following info, it's just on the previous page: understanding water-injection / combustion-wet-explanations-by-remi-guillet-t5794-40.html

a) A publication in engineering techniques (where econologie.com is cited as a reference ...): https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/bas ... 10005.html

b) Its work is at the base of the PAVE boiler (water vapor pump): inventions, innovations / boiler-CSTC-pave-pump-a-steam-and-water-t14245.html

Sorry but here, we are much further than the simple proof of concept... even the Chinese use it: https://www.econologie.com/combustion-h ... -nox-smog/

But you, behind your keyboard, YOU know ... oh poor you!

You answered about the proof of concept, thank you, indeed an achievement goes beyond.
But you seem to ignore what SEO is. For a scientist or engineer, it is the number of times his studies are cited or taken up by others. On this point, I maintain that its referencing is marginal. R Guillet looks very French-French to me.

That said, that doesn't mean that he wouldn't have a good idea, and that's why I asked the question, without thinking that it would provoke susceptibility reactions.

I wanted to know more. You say there is a 1923 patent on the matter. I can't find it on Espacenet, or if it is, which one is it? in the list ?). The basic idea would be old, is it the principle of Guillet's process? If an idea from 1923 did not make a splash, there may be good reasons which would still be valid and would also explain the confidentiality of the process on a global scale. Or Rémi Guillet may not have released his process until recently, and success will come. I have no clear-cut idea, I am only wary by experience, both of the "brilliant" ideas that emerge nearly a century later, as of the "cocorico" ideas which remain France.

[GuyGadebois]

If an idea of ​​1923 did not take root, there may be good reasons which would still be valid and would also explain the confidentiality of the process on a world scale.

Yes, the "lack of interest" on the part of the oil industry at the time to validate and allow the commercialization of processes aimed at saving what was their business, their influence being able to "make" and "undo" the most valid patents.