Hello
Pierre-Yves wrote:On the two trawlers of Boulogne, one is 10% less consumption, the other 0%. On the 10%, the behavior change share is estimated locally at 3% ... (10 - 3) / 2 = 3,5%: there is not much left for the Vulcano system! Not enough to flirt, therefore, especially since both trawlers work in the same conditions.
I will try to find out more by going on site.
It has been said that Vulcano merely humidified the intake air. Who can give me directions on this?
Personally when I test 3,5% and even 5% this is part of the margin of error it simply means no measurable gain. with our little way
20% and 30% it's measurable
I do not know Vulacano or the way it is installed, just seen the box in photos from the outside, no more than hypnosis
but before marketing something, we must make sure that it is functional and even have a follow-up on the syteme sold, otherwise it is doomed to failure .. (a user not content is more damaged than 10 users satisfied ..)
For Chatman it's not because a propeller that it should not work, quite the contrary
Since you know the Lycoming engines you should know how to consume too
On a Lycoming o-290 D-2 135hp with a MaCCauley propeller
DTM 75 50 has 2350rpm cruise 20,2 liters per hour with water doping measured accurate with a cup measured at the end (I leave you the care to seek the original consumption of this engine do not forget that it harness on a 172m cessna propeller of 1,90m which the diameter of that of a Musketeer ..
As we are on a forum, I will not go into the details you understand why ..
Those who think that just make the engine swallow the humid air it tries (I've never seen a plane engine get upset when it comes in a cloud of white cotton ..
Andre
