pb2488 wrote:I can not understand where it hangs when the system is simple enough to implement, inexpensive, free and very promising.
If it seems so easy, what are you waiting for to realize it and tell us about your results?
Christophe wrote:You do not miss a toupee!
pb2488 = pb2497 = gebé = deception on your identity = you do not care about our mouth openly !!
Christophe wrote:You've been cheating on a forum teenager there in us insulting as censors ...
Andre wrote:The governments do not decide much they try to keep the maximum of voters in their favors, those who decide are the multinationals
Andre wrote:Despite its great simplicity for the common user who already found it difficult to open the hood to add windshield washer difficult to change a wheel in case of crecvaison, you will ask him to fill a tank of water and more, and in winter what does it do to prevent it from freezing? add alcohol to the water it degrades the sytem ..
Andre wrote:builders are looking to build maintenance-free cars without grease and if it was possible without oil and antifreeze changes, even they think of making disposable cars, they are looking for the most economical to build they install an ERG because it was imposed on them, they install parchocs, airbags because this is imposed
Andre wrote:The automaker is the same as the printer manufacturer, the printer costs peanuts but the inkwells exceed the price of the printer, calculates the price of a car and XNUM X taxes that you paid to the government, you will see that the government and the oil companies each derive their profits car manufacturers are just a chain of oil ..
Andre wrote:Michelin said the automonbile is an accessory of the tire
Imagine what an oil company can think of automonbile?
Andre wrote:You did not listen to Rott Killer from Strasbourg on the other forum with 1678 post and an experiment in doping with water, and obviously you did not seek to know Vitry sur Orne (the small village next to Rombas) if there are results.
Andre wrote:Now nothing prevents you to give us the details of construction and tests that your knowledge has done in doping with the water out of bubbler, from GV of reactor dimension of the rod, entered in the engine, turbo? ect .. kind of test highway or urban road?
editing that does not work are as interresting to anlyser as those who walk ..
Andre wrote:For a guy who starts he did not choose the simple solution, R5 has gasoline? it is necessary to juggle with the exit of the reactor and how to enter the engine in strong depression to the low regimes to pose a calibrated jet ect ..
Preferable that it puts this on a diesel, much more tolerant to the setting and the% of saving are higher on diesel than petrol engine.
pierre wrote:It was on a mower motor but in parallel, he had recovered a R5 diesel to try a car. Side mower, it does not work, R5, I do not know if it started.
Andre wrote:Now on a lawn mower it is not very complicated to operate in 100% panton with gasoline without water, but if he expects to consume water on a mower (he is next to the plate ), water in a common bubbler, 100% pantone it is a booby catcher, you consume fuel and a low% water once the fuel consumed the residue water and heavy fuel is unusable.
Go back to "Water injection in heat engines: information and explanations"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 110 guests