these 750 ° C would be even less in the pantone reactor, thanks to the magnetization present
but perhaps in a different form: H + and OH- or H-, I do not know, and even, if there is not in great quantity, the recombination of isolated atom is it seems much more energy (hydrogen torch principle)
still they have to recombine only after the compression phase of the engine
the principle of electrolysis, mentioned by Mr Moreau, seems to attribute the same advantages to the gas produced by its high frequency electrolysis system
would the "plasma" produced, evoked by Mr Pantone in his reactor have the ability to be stable to keep the atoms separate?
are there conditions which destroy this kind of ionized gas, after its creation? : (too hot; too cold, in the pipe after the reactor.
or when it arrives in the intake pipe containing air with too large a temperature difference, compared to itself, it loses its acquired advantages
the system evoked by Meyer
(I correct: I mean Brown gas which implodes)
http://quanthomme.free/carburant/GazBrown.htm
makes me speculate in another way:
he talks about implosion with the use of the gas produced by his system and there is only a little water left as a result
if the gas produced by the pantone system did the same, but in the compression phase: the engine would save energy for this compression phase
I know that it looks very very big,
the piston would be sucked in the "compression" phase and discharged in the explosion phase
hence a much quieter engine
there would be 2 engine times out of the 4
I also know
how would diesel find heat to ignite?
that said, the amount of gas produced by the reactor probably leaves enough room for air to activate the explosion
the engine makes less noise, and at the same time you feel blown away
any other way to make more of an engine make it make more noise
Isn't that a bit logical somewhere?
bolt [/ url]