A Wiki Pantone?

[Christophe]

Ok waaw you like it!

So I install this as soon as possible

In the meantime it would be good to start thinking about the structure Michel has already given a basis.

Here is the structure of the Wiki "understanding of the panton" which had remained private between some members of this forum. You see that the advancement between () is not very important ...

In this section:
1 Group communication and organization
2 Scientific bases and hypotheses to know (external links possible) (70%)
3 Building (20%)
4 Understanding: Physical quantities of the reactor (10%)
5 Understanding: Study of an engine modified to 100% pantone or to water doping (10%)
6 Understanding: experimentation and achievement of the group (10%)
7 Examples of applications and performance (0%)
8 Drafting of summary documents (0%)
9 Some testimonials: water in the engines (10%)
10 Organization and funding (0%)
11 Useful files for understanding the process

[Targol]

I find the idea excellent.
On the other hand, as you noted, if the contributions are open to everyone, this requires that moderators with good knowledge of the process closely monitor changes to correct dumplings or sabotage potential (when we see the eagerness of public authorities and manufacturers to disparage these technologies, I imagine quite well that some are capable of coming willingly to rot this wiki to discredit your work).

In short, I would say that there are 2 solutions:

• or not to launch without having the certainty that this wiki will be monitored regularly and closely by the pantone specialists of forums (on this subject, me for example, I would be of no use )
• or only authorize the modification to registered users.

[elephant]

Very wise, Targol.

I will look for the second solution

I propose that the acceptance criterion is to have posted at least fifty messages.

[abyssin3]

Here! what excellent idea
Is that making the one that exists public if I understand correctly?

[Christophe]

Here! what excellent idea
Is that making the one that exists public if I understand correctly?

Not precisely for various reasons, in particular confidentiality and compatibility between the hosts ...

By cons we will resume a lot of info published on this one

[Targol]

Very wise, Targol.

Thank you, thank you, I'm going to blush

I will look for the second solution

I propose that the acceptance criterion is to have posted at least fifty messages.

You know, very often, just the fact of having to register "filters" quite a bit the smart ones who, otherwise, would have fun polluting.

I think that a simple form where the user explains why he wants to be part of the editors may be sufficient in terms of filtering.
Knowing that registration as a writer is only effective once validated by one of the mods.

[Christophe]

Well I don't know ...

Choosing moderators is limiting the richness of this wiki so it's not really what I wanted to achieve ... I therefore prefer to leave it "open" to the writing of the public .... at a pinch as you do. say "registered" members (rah still a registration will say some ...)

Now one thing is for sure: daily monitoring will be necessary but the wiki saves the Nieme modifications in the database, a backward modification is therefore possible quite easily.

Ah what a brave beast this Wiki

[Targol]

Ah what a brave beast this Wiki

It is true that this framework is really good.
The only flaw is the writing syntax that puts off some (making a table in wiki, it's not very intuitive, for example). I was faced with the problem at work where even computer scientists continue to look gray as soon as they are told about Wiki.

Fortunately, we find more and more "WYSIWYG editors" who write the wiki for the contributors ... Although ... it does not know how to make wiki tables this stuff !!!

[Christophe]

Uh can we make a table in wiki code?

[Targol]

Uh can we make a table in wiki code?

Yeah, with "{", "|", and other cabalistic signs.

will see leaves for more information.