Some prints and bulk prints:
1) If all articles are "oriented" in this way this journal no longer deserves the name of scientist it simply becomes a propaganda journal!
2) The journalist, in exchange for our help (Julien and myself) had promised to quote Econologie.com, which he did not do. It's a lack of professionalism and honor. I intend to show our rights on this point.
Quoting on us instead of econology (or even quantum man) is the formal proof of the mystification purpose of the process.
3) Our proper names (Julien and me) can be associated with the aforementioned site. Given its content, this can be detrimental to our professional lives. Defamation action can therefore be taken.
4) Here is below the emails of our first exchanges, which I therefore make public so that you can appreciate the difference in treatment between the info he received and the info I gave him. I also provide you with the journalist's email. You are free to write to him what you think.
You will notice that I never said, in these exchanges, the words attributed to me.
1st contact wrote:I am writing an article for Science & Vie on the Pantone engine, following a series of experiments carried out at the Ecole des Mines de Douai (which show that it could work). You are one of the few to maintain a rational attitude towards the process and I would like to have your opinion and in any case discuss the conclusions of your own experiences.
At your disposal,
Pierre G. Science & Life
My first answer wrote:Hello,
I do not know how you tried to reach me but I did not receive anything.
Otherwise here is my Voip number: 0870 408 ***
I am aware of the work of the Douai School of Mines (we talked about it here: https://www.econologie.com/forums/pantone-et ... t3663.html )
It is regrettable, given the means they had at their disposal, that they did not take into account the remarks that I made at the end of my PFE, they started again from the "base" and therefore are necessarily reached the same conclusions as me ... but more than 5 years later. That is to say that 100% Pantone is difficult to master. Or water doping (see the difference here: https://www.econologie.com/les-principau ... -1314.html )
It is also a shame that their work was not carried out on water doping. Something that the Mayor of Vitry Sur Orne has just courageously achieved on one of their municipal vehicles with very good results, a press conference was held on this occasion last Thursday (I participated to help the reaction of the dossier of press and I made a short presentation during the conference).
I invite you to read the details on this page: https://www.econologie.com/moteur-panton ... -3404.html
I remain at your disposal for technical details.
Sincerely
Christophe Martz, Dipl. Eng. ENSAIS
https://www.econologie.com
His 1st answer wrote:
I am very happy to have finally established contact and I will call you tomorrow to talk about these experiences. One word all the same: I know that the experience of the students of Douai is imperfect, incomplete and open to criticism. But it is the only study carried out in a certified laboratory, a pretext that allows me to finally mention the Pantone engine, on which my readers have been bothering me for years. We will talk about Vitry's experience, but I cannot place it on the same level, unless the measurements are validated by an organization worthy of the name. This is the rule of the game ... For my part, I am convinced that there is something to be gained from research from the Pantone reactor, but I am very skeptical about the gains and performances announced.
Sincerely,
-> 1er GROS MONSONGE: where is Vitry mentioned in the article?
My answer wrote:Just a word before our telephone discussion and concerning your skepticism that I understand easily.
Isn't the best certified lab ever ... everyday use?
Example: if hundreds of agricultural tractors are modified all over France it is good that there is indeed a substantial gain.
Farmers are pragmatic people ... When annual fuel oil bills from a farm drop by 30%, is certification really necessary? What about your readers who want you to talk about Pantone? And I'm not even talking about the reduction in pollution from soot, from drained oil that gets dirty less quickly ...
For "certified" trials, the Aisne Chamber of Agriculture has carried out some in partnership with a Cuma see: https://www.econologie.com/moteur-panton ... -3399.html . Obviously it is less "certified" than the Mines ...
If you like Physics I also recommend reading this document (not "certified"): https://www.econologie.com/ionisation-de ... -3324.html who should give ideas to physicists or researchers who read you.
In the end if I had only one piece of advice to give you: make a good distinction between 100% Pantone and water doping ...
Last thing: for the telephone conversation, I am quite difficult to reach, if I do not answer, leave a message please and I will call you back as soon as possible. How long do you plan to take?
Sincerely
Christophe Martz, Dipl. Eng. ENSAIS
https://www.econologie.com
5) Rather than writing a single common response to "econologie.com", I think it would be interesting for everyone to write a letter (email or paper) to S&V for denounce the quality of this article... as much in the background as in the form ... or else we let it pee ...
What do you think Julien? Since you are the second most involved in this case?
