What kind of window installation with ITE?

[aerialcastor]

The laying in tunnel is the pose between table.
A small recap, knowing that there is not all types of pose: and that especially we do not see the insulation.

Clearly I advise you a poses applied with external dubbing. It increases your glazing area, decreases thermal bridges, increases solar gain. On the other hand we see the chest outside because 14cm is not enough for the fully integrated in the thickness of the insulation.
I do not see at all in what it is a problem, the shutters flying we see them well.

The problem is that you do not want to see the chest and not lose windows ... This is not possible in Reno except to break the lintel to remake higher (about 1000 € per lintel).

The walls will have a R = 6.4m².K / W

At the tables you will have maximum R = 2m².K / W

Which means that your board surfaces will lose three times more energy than your wall surfaces.
Or that 1m ² of surface of table will lose as much energy as 3m ² of surface of wall.

You can quickly make a calculation of the surfaces of table that you have with you because according to the number of window of the will lose as much energy by the tables as by the walls ...

[dodo]

yes 14 cm except in the frames it will give a few like this.

http://images.google.com/imgres?q=ite+en+nu+exterieur&hl=fr&tbo=d&gbv=2&biw=1024&bih=579&tbm=isch&tbnid=7MkHPasLQxkC5M:&imgrefurl=http://www.weber.fr/isolation-thermique-par-lexterieur-ite/concevoir-et-prescrire/carnet-de-details-ite/raccords-avec-menuiserie-introduction.html&docid=YZ1oP72p3SloIM&imgurl=http://www.weber.fr/typo3temp/pics/c6a73f8004.gif&w=350&h=253&ei=C8_RUN7hD8TC0QW5wYDwCg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=158&vpy=132&dur=248&hovh=191&hovw=264&tx=154&ty=89&sig=117182233533112424631&page=4&tbnh=147&tbnw=203&start=63&ndsp=23&ved=1t:429,r:75,s:0,i:316

The walls will have a R = 6.4m².K / W

how do you arrive you have an 6,4 R because 14 cm of graph gives around a R of 4.

Are you saying that my ite will not help me?

I forgot to mention that I currently have my joinery in rabbet.

[aerialcastor]

On the contrary, it is the ITE that isolates the most.
The ITI R = 1.75m².K / W
The bricks R = 0.25m².K / W
The ITE R = 4.46.4m².K / W

If we add up all we have a R = 6.4m².K / W

[dodo]

On the contrary, it is the ITE that isolates the most.
The ITI R = 1.75m².K / W
The bricks R = 0.25m².K / W
The ITE R = 4.46.4m².K / W

If we add up all we have a R = 6.4m².K / W

ha ok it adds up, me who thought sweet itil, that's what I'm going to do first.

I'm not sure that it improves the insulation of the table as the insulation does not come up to the windows.

so i'm going to lose 2 kw by m2 so saw that my array has to do about 1,48 * 1,25 on 12 cm of bricks

that gives me 1,48 * 0,12 * 2 = 0,35m2 + 1,25 * 0,12 * 2 = 0,3 is a total per table of 0,65 m2.

[dodo]

here is the terrace

https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... DVDxWN.png

[dodo]

if I opt for an ite with the thermal bridge of 3cm insulation back in the table is what it will be more effective than if I redo my ITIL in 14cm.

[aerialcastor]

Your loss calculation is totally wrong.

The thermal losses depend on the conductivity of the wall (the inverse of the resistance), the surface and the difference in temperature between the inside and the outside.

You have a R = 6.4 so U = 1 / 6.4 = 0.16W / m².K which means that you 0.16W per square meter of surface and for 1 degree of difference between inside and outside.

To know the energy in the year you lose, multiply by the DJU and 24 (24h per day).

E = 0.16 * * dju 24kWh / m² / year

This is a very simplistic method that does not take into account the thermal bridges.


For the question of the ITE against the ITI it is impossible to answer like that. There is a lot of things that can be taken into account (the thermal bridges of the slabs of the walls of roofs ...)

A building site is looked at globally taking all into account.
Not focusing on particular points without taking into account what it implies next.

[dodo]

so that gives us:

E=0.16*2706*24kWh/m²/an =10752 /m2/an.

[Obamot]

There's still something that crumples me, if we have this configuration:



It implies that at the foot of the building we have the road and at least a sidewalk, so how can we have what looks like a garage, then in addition a staircase that would come down in front of:

here is the terrace

And what would rhyme such an architectural layout to this place. it does not make sense!

Hum! Weird, weird ...

[dodo]

the photo of the window is south and between the wall of the house and the sidewalk we have the garage slope which must 4m.

the other photo is a terrace with a local below west oriented and the opening of the local north.